No safety, no experiments; no experiments, no learning.

Your team is trapped between two primal fears: being replaced by AI and being left behind without it. While they're frozen in analysis paralysis, your competitors are learning at lightning speed.

The result? Shadow AI usage, whereby employees secretly experiment with tools but don't share learnings—or complete avoidance disguised as "being careful." Meanwhile, the IMF estimates that AI will negatively impact 30% of jobs in advanced economies, escalating workplace anxiety to unprecedented levels.

The solution isn't another change management framework. It's understanding the neuroscience of psychological safety and implementing four evidence-based tools your team can use immediately.

The people who most need to experiment with AI—those in routine cognitive roles—experience the highest psychological threat. They're being asked to enthusiastically adopt tools that might replace them, triggering what neuroscientists call a "threat state."

Research by Amy Edmondson at Harvard Business School reveals that team learning requires psychological safety—the belief that interpersonal risk-taking feels safe. But AI adoption adds an existential twist: The threat isn't just social

© Psychology Today