OP-ED: Interim supply and the quiet expansion of executive discretion
Newfoundland & Labrador
Newfoundland and Labrador Opinion
Share this Story : PNI Atlantic News Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
OP-ED: Interim supply and the quiet expansion of executive discretion
Newfoundland and Labrador approved nearly $4 billion in public spending last week through its Interim Supply Act, passed with little public attention.
Subscribe now to access this story and more:
Unlimited access to the website and app
Exclusive access to premium content, newsletters and podcasts
Full access to the e-Edition app, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists
Subscribe or sign in to your account to continue your reading experience.
Unlimited access to the website and app
Exclusive access to premium content, newsletters and podcasts
Full access to the e-Edition app, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists
Create an account or sign in to continue your reading experience.
Access additional stories every month
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in our commenting community
Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
The measure gives the Treasury Board authority to move funds across departments in real time, allowing funding to be reallocated across departments before the full budget is debated and competing priorities are publicly weighed, often under conditions where increasing one allocation requires reducing another.
The vote was procedural. Its implications extend beyond administration.
Interim supply determines how that money is actually spent before the budget is finalized. In practice, this allows funding for health, infrastructure, and social services to be reallocated before those priorities are publicly debated. In practical terms, this shifts when trade-offs become visible.
Funding decisions that affect hospital capacity, infrastructure........
