menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Dems’ idiotic rhetoric on courts reveals what they’re really after

31 0
18.05.2026

US News Metro Long Island Politics

Sports NFL MLB Olympics NBA NHL College Football College Basketball WNBA

Business Personal Finance

Entertainment TV Movies Music Celebrities Awards Theater

Lifestyle Weird But True Sex & Relationships Viral Trends Human Interest Parenting Fashion & Beauty Food & Drink Travel

Health Wellness Fitness Health Care Medicine Men’s Health Women’s Health Mental Health Nutrition

Science Space Environment Wildlife Archaeology

Today’s Paper Covers Columnists Horoscopes Crosswords & Games Sports Odds Podcasts Careers

Email Newsletters Official Store Home Delivery Tips

Switch between CA and NY editions here.

Dems’ idiotic rhetoric on courts reveals what they’re really after

See more of our coverage in your search results.

The story plays out the same way virtually every time.

Democrats, egged on by the increasingly powerful progressive base, push some obviously unconstitutional scheme that they contended is needed to preserve “democracy.”

The courts inevitably knock down the ploy.

Frustrated, Democrats ratchet up the anger, promising to “reform” the judiciary that stands in their way.

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) recently argued on the House floor that the next Democratic White House “does not need a court reform commission like some college seminar. We need action.

Democrats’ wealth taxes are Trojan horses: Beware what lies inside

Democratic Calif. gov candidate and ex-LA mayor blasts party for blaming homeless, affordability crises on Trump

Tennessee Dem Steve Cohen tears up on air after redistricting destroys his reelection bid

“We need term limits for justices. We need to expand this morally bankrupt Supreme Court from 9 to 13.”

Do we? Great, let’s do it today.

Republicans run both houses and the White House, after all; they could pack the court right now.

According to Khanna, there’s nothing procedurally or constitutionally improper about it. Indeed, it’s imperative.

Surely, the congressman isn’t proposing that one party should be empowered to operate under a different set of rules than the other?

How Democrats’ rage over Virginia gerrymander exposes their larger contempt for democracy

Of course, we all know that if President Donald Trump packed the court, progressives would........

© New York Post