The Landmark Cases Council will bring together several eminent legal scholars to critically analyze Supreme Court decisions

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

Canadians rightly respect their courts. Such respect is foundational to public trust in our institutions and confidence that disputes are resolved fairly. Yet, confidence in the justice system is starting to slip, particularly at the appellate and Supreme Court levels, where decisions increasingly divide Canadians along political lines.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

This is not a welcome development.

The central problem is the expansion of the judicial role under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Charter — properly interpreted — can be a valuable contribution because it provides a roster of individual rights that should exist beyond the reach of momentary frenzies of elected majorities. Those rights are legal rights and should be interpreted by the judiciary as such.

This newsletter tackles hot topics with boldness, verve and wit. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Platformed will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.

But the judiciary’s reliance on the “living tree” doctrine has allowed judges to move beyond interpreting law to effectively making it,........

© National Post