Paul W. Bennett: AI isn't revolutionizing learning. It's mimicking original thought
Little attention has been given to its long-term consequences, inside and outside of classrooms
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
Generative AI platforms such as ChatGPT have entered classrooms, universities, and homework routines with astonishing speed and little attention to the long-term consequences. A recent Canadian news report, aired on CBC’s The National, also revealed that teachers have mostly been left to fend for themselves.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
The current infatuation with AI is part of a recurrent pattern, but the latest educational fad is far more fundamental in its impact on teaching and learning in classrooms. It’s time to ask: Are these tools eating away at our brain power and leading schools astray?
Technology evangelists and educators espousing ‘21st century learning’ tout its ability to save time, individualize instruction, and increase access to information. But little has been done to assess its effects on students’ ability to think independently, write clearly, and engage with knowledge deeply.
This newsletter tackles hot topics with boldness, verve and wit. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Platformed will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.
What’s encouraging is the fact that leading cognitive scientists, evidence-based researchers, and experienced frontline teachers are beginning to right the balance.