Michael Higgins: The arrogance of Chief Justice Richard Wagner
Share this Story : National Post Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
Michael Higgins: The arrogance of Chief Justice Richard Wagner
He must recuse himself from Emergencies Act case
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
Richard Wagner, the chief justice of the Supreme Court, must recuse himself if there is to be a hearing of the federal government’s appeal in the Emergencies Act case, or risk poisoning the well of justice.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
Unlimited online access to National Post.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
Support local journalism.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
Unlimited online access to National Post.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
Support local journalism.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Enjoy additional articles per month.
Get email updates from your favourite authors.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
Enjoy additional articles per month
Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
Wagner has shown such a prejudice toward the Freedom Convoy protesters as to raise questions about his impartiality. Questioning the impartiality of a judge, let alone the highest in the land, is a serious matter. But questions must be asked in light of inappropriate and impolitic comments made by Wagner in April 2022.
Michael Higgins: The arrogance of Chief Justice Richard Wagner Back to video
Questions must also be raised because of how incredibly important this case is. It concerns the limits of state power; the rights of individuals; the exercise of free expression; and, at its core, what principles a liberal democracy values.
This newsletter from NP Comment tackles the topics you care about. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)
There was an error, please provide a valid email address.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Platformed will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.
Wagner told Montreal’s Le Devoir newspaper in 2022 that the convoy was “a small beginning of anarchy where some people decided to take other citizens hostage, to take the law into their own hands.”
“Anarchy” is a strong word. The anarchists of the late 19th and early 20th centuries were responsible for the assassination of numerous heads of state, including U.S. President William McKinley in 1901. Many adherents to the movement advocate the violent overthrow of government.
Yet Wagner should not have said anything at all. The “Ethical Principles for Judges,” which Wagner helped write, states that, “Judges should be cautious in their communications on social media relating to matters that could come before the court.” While the section concerns social media, the principle obviously applies to all media.
Wagner must have suspected that the invocation of the Emergencies Act two months prior could well come before his court. His suspicions should have been aroused by the fact that it was an unprecedented action, but also that court challenges were already being considered, with the Canadian Civil Liberties Association saying on Feb. 22, 2022, “We are taking the Government of Canada to court.”
Two courts have already ruled that the Canadian government was unreasonable in invoking the Emergencies Act, but the Carney Liberals have appealed to the Supreme Court, which is considering whether to hear the........
