Kerry Sun: Supreme Court has no right to soften child porn laws
The court has undermined the ability of public institutions to punish the evil of sexual abuse. The notwithstanding clause is the answer
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
It’s a reflection of the sorry state of Canadian justice: last Friday, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the one-year mandatory minimum sentences for the offences of possessing and accessing child pornography are unconstitutional. The case, Quebec (Attorney General) v. Senneville, involved two offenders who admitted to possessing 475 and 805 files, respectively, depicting children being sexually abused in horrific ways. Despite this, the court held, 5–4, that the mandatory minimums constituted “cruel and unusual punishment” contrary to Section 12 of the Charter.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
The backlash has been swift and justly deserved. Several provincial premiers, joined by federal opposition leader Pierre Poilievre, immediately endorsed the use of Section 33 of the Charter, also known as the notwithstanding clause, to reverse the court’s ruling and restore the mandatory minimums. This is a welcome first step.
This newsletter tackles hot topics with boldness, verve and wit. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Platformed will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.
As envisioned by its framers, the notwithstanding clause is a mechanism to prevent overreaching judicial interpretations of rights from undermining the common good. If there were ever a decision that........





















Toi Staff
Gideon Levy
Tarik Cyril Amar
Stefano Lusa
Mort Laitner
Robert Sarner
Andrew Silow-Carroll
Constantin Von Hoffmeister
Ellen Ginsberg Simon
Mark Travers Ph.d