By Narayanan Kizhumundayur

Humour is one of the greatest gifts given to humanity. It has the power to bring people together, lighten tense situations, and offer a fresh perspective on life’s absurdities. A well-placed joke can turn a heated debate into a moment of shared laughter, a stressful day into something bearable, and a dull gathering into a memorable one.

But humour, in its purest form, is meant to entertain, not to divide. It should be seen as humour—nothing more, nothing less. Unfortunately, in today’s world, especially in the realm of politics, humour is no longer just humour. It is dissected, debated, and often weaponized, leading to unnecessary outrage and controversy.

History is filled with examples of how humour has been used to reflect society’s truths. Court jesters in medieval times had the freedom to mock even kings, often delivering harsh truths in a way that was acceptable because it was wrapped in humour.

In ancient India, the role of the Vidushaka in royal courts was particularly important. The Vidushaka was more than just a comedian—he was a trusted confidant of the king, whose wit and humour helped defuse tense situations.

In Sanskrit dramas, especially those by Kalidasa, the Vidushaka played the role of both a comic relief and a wise counselor, using humour to highlight flaws in governance and human nature. The Vidushaka’s sharp tongue and playful nature allowed him to say things that others feared to express, making him an essential figure in maintaining balance in the court. This tradition reflects the deep-rooted understanding that humour, when used wisely, can be a powerful tool for truth and diplomacy.

However, as societies have evolved, so has the way humour is perceived. What was once accepted as lighthearted fun is now increasingly analyzed under a........

© Kashmir Observer