The Supreme Court ruling annulling its earlier order on the liquidation of Bhushan Steel under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) reignited the debate on the credibility and transparency of the existing corporate debt resolution framework. On May 2, the Supreme Court ordered the liquidation of Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd., marking one of the most significant tests of the IBC since its enactment in 2016. In that order, the court revoked the resolution plan by JSW Steel and directed the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to initiate liquidation proceedings. The order, which was based on the finding that the resolution plan had procedural flaws and violated the IBC, was annulled on July 31. With promoters and creditors locked in courtroom battles, a key question arises: Does the bankruptcy law have hidden benefits? The prophylactic effects of such legislation often go unnoticed.

An important consideration in the context of India is the effect of the IBC reforms on how managers divert resources. The last decade saw several high-profile cases of fund diversions, leading to financial distress at firms and adverse consequences for their lenders. Can stronger creditor rights reduce fund diversion? The standard approach of using large-scale financial........

© hindustantimes