menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Alan Simpson: NatureScot may be threatening a rare mussel it should be protecting It would be a tragic irony if a population was wiped out because the body supposed to protect them didn’t do it’s job properly.

14 0
17.03.2025

IF you ask anyone whether or not they agree with clean, green energy being generated by onshore windfarms, the vast majority would overwhelmingly support it.

What’s not to like after all and given Scotland’s capricious weather caused by being stuck in the North Atlantic then wind should certainly not be in short supply.

However, if you ask the same people after a windfarm is put up on a hill not far from their homes, then most of the answers may then be vastly different.

Turbines are the classic Nimby’s domain with various local campaigns currently underway across Scotland against turbines, pylons and battery storage units.

It appears that very few people are still keen on green energy when it starts to impact on their own lives.

Read More: The rail electrification causing chaos on Scotland's roads

But regardless of the campaigns, green energy schemes are here to stay and we should all welcome that, even if the view out of your kitchen is not as nice as it once was.

The alternative, which is a return to coal and gas fired power stations, really isn’t an option and everyone should agree with that - even Donald Trump.

Scotland is surrounded by sea and there are vast arrays already in operation with even larger ones still in the pipeline which should generate more than enough electricity without building more onshore.

But the rush to construct yet more onshore windfarms continues at pace and sometimes it hard to see the logic, particularly when it comes to our most scenic areas.

However, there are limits to how much people will take when it comes to onshore windfarms.

As if to illustrate the........

© Herald Scotland