menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

The science of saving fish

9 0
yesterday

Have you noticed how the water bodies of Kashmir no longer behave the way they once did? Winters feel different, snow arrives late, sunny days appear even during the harshest cold spells, and the water in streams seems fluctuate unpredictably. If you ask the people around, about when these changes began, many will struggle to name a single moment because the change has been quiet and slow. And as these shifts unfold, the fish that depend on these cold waters are beginning to struggle often long before the problem becomes visible to us. This silent distress is easy to overlook, but this is where conservation really begins – not with bans or enforcement, but with careful observation and early understanding of what our rivers and their fish are telling us.

When we hear the word “conservation,” we often imagine protected areas, fishing bans, or rules and regulations imposed from outside. In Kashmir, conservation is frequently seen as something that restricts livelihoods rather than protects futures. But real conservation, especially of fish in our rivers and lakes, is not about stopping people. It is about understanding how nature works, and acting before it is too late and the damage becomes irreversible. The freshwater systems of Kashmir are changing in ways that are hard to ignore. Winters no longer follow familiar patterns. Snowfall arrives late or in short spells, sometimes outside the traditional Chillai Kalan period, while unusually sunny days now appear even during what were once the coldest months. These changes alter how snow melts, how rivers flow, and how long streams remain cold enough to support native fish.

Fish are among the most sensitive indicators of these changes. Cold-water species in Kashmir’s rivers and lakes have evolved to survive in stable, cold, oxygen-rich waters. Their feeding habits, breeding cycles, and habitat use are finely synchronised with the seasonal rhythms. When water temperatures rise, flow patterns shift, or riverbeds are disturbed, these species struggle for survival long before the effects become visible to the human eye.

Across Kashmir, people increasingly say the rivers no longer feel the same, meaning, less predictable flows, fewer familiar fish, and changes that seem gradual but persistent. What is often misunderstood is that fish will not disappear overnight. Declines usually begin silently. A species may still be present, but it feeds less efficiently, grows more slowly, or fails to reproduce successfully. By the time numbers drop sharply, recovery becomes difficult and expensive.

Conservation, therefore, is not just about counting fish or enforcing seasonal bans. It is about protecting the conditions that allow fish to survive: cold water, clean substrates, stable flows, and connected habitats. When rivers are altered by unplanned construction, encroachment, excessive sand extraction, or pollution, fish suffer even if no one is directly catching them.

The impacts are not limited to ecology. Many communities in Kashmir depend on local fish for nutrition and secondary income. As native fish decline, they are often replaced by more tolerant or invasive species that do not offer the same ecological or nutritional value. What looks like an environmental issue soon becomes a food and livelihood concern. It is about recognising that healthy rivers support both. There is also a wider warning embedded in the decline of fish. Rivers that can no longer support coldwater species are rivers under stress. The same changes that harm fish (warming waters, erratic flows, sediment overload) eventually affect irrigation, drinking water quality, and flood behaviour. In this sense, fish act as early warning systems for the health of our freshwater resources.

The science of saving fish, therefore, is neither about choosing between people and nature nor is a niche scientific goal. It is about safeguarding Kashmir’s water future. Conservation informed by science looks ahead while the one that ignores science often reacts too late. It identifies vulnerable systems early, prioritises protection where it matters most, and avoids interventions that arrive only after damage is irreversible. As climate change accelerates and pressure on water resources increases, we as responsible citizens must rethink what conservation really means. It is not about choosing between people and nature. It is about recognizing that healthy rivers, resilient fish populations, and secure livelihoods are deeply connected. Protecting fish today is, ultimately, an investment in the ecological stability of the Valley tomorrow.

In listening to what our fish are telling us about our rivers, we may still find time to protect what sustains us all.

Dr Syed Talia Mushtaq, Assistant Professor, Division of FRM, Faculty of Fisheries, SKUAST-K

Prof. Tasaduq Hussain Shah,

Head, Division of FRM, Faculty of Fisheries, SKUAST-K


© Greater Kashmir