Since its inception in 2007, the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue—the strategic partnership between Australia, India, Japan, and the United States—has struggled to define a clear purpose beyond counterbalancing China. Despite regular summits and growing rhetorical alignment, the grouping has largely fallen short of delivering tangible economic cooperation.

The Quad was revived in 2017 during the first Trump administration to create a more unified Indo-Pacific security strategy. The Biden administration then elevated the Quad to leader-level summits and broadened its agenda beyond security. The 2024 Wilmington Declaration marked a turning point, committing the four nations to deeper collaboration on clean energy supply chains as part of a wider focus on energy security and economic resilience.

Since its inception in 2007, the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue—the strategic partnership between Australia, India, Japan, and the United States—has struggled to define a clear purpose beyond counterbalancing China. Despite regular summits and growing rhetorical alignment, the grouping has largely fallen short of delivering tangible economic cooperation.

The Quad was revived in 2017 during the first Trump administration to create a more unified Indo-Pacific security strategy. The Biden administration then elevated the Quad to leader-level summits and broadened its agenda beyond security. The 2024 Wilmington Declaration marked a turning point, committing the four nations to deeper collaboration on clean energy supply chains as part of a wider focus on energy security and economic resilience.

Yet the Quad foreign ministers’ meeting in Washington this month made no mention of energy security, despite growing regional concern over the issue. Instead, the joint statement launched the Quad Critical Minerals Initiative to “strengthen economic security and collective resilience by collaborating to secure and diversify critical minerals supply chains.” It also pledged closer coordination on “critical and emerging technology.” U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio emphasized that the Quad must become a “vehicle for action,” citing critical minerals as a test case. But without a broader energy strategy to anchor demand and guide infrastructure investment, the initiative risks becoming disconnected from the core systems it is meant to support.

Rubio’s remarks were an inflection point. With U.S. clean energy investment facing renewed uncertainty following recent congressional efforts to roll back parts of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), the Quad now stands out as one of the few platforms where energy security and economic resilience continue to draw bipartisan urgency. To fulfill that promise, the Quad must move beyond fragmented supply chain coordination and articulate a shared vision for energy cooperation. This cooperation should link critical minerals not just to technology partnerships but also to infrastructure investment, anchored demand, and cross-border deployment.

A “Quad Energy Bridge” could provide this framework, offering a practical blueprint to align upstream supply chains, clean energy innovation, and market development across all four nations.

Realizing the vision of........

© Foreign Policy