Dr. Micah Ben David Naziri points out in a Patheos article “Beyond Meat: How Arabia Turned ‘Bread’ into ‘Flesh’ when in Biblical Hebrew, leḥem (לחם) means bread, and often functions for food itself, as the blessing over a mixed meal in general even without bread.

One of the most revealing and defining characteristics of the Semitic language family Dr. Naziri states is the way a single triliteral root can preserve a shared semantic core while simultaneously diverging into radically different cultural expressions. Few roots expose this across languages more clearly than the root from which the very city name of Bethlehem derives (L-Ḥ-M).

Across most Semitic languages, the root overwhelmingly denotes bread, nourishment, staple food, or sustenance in general. In Biblical Hebrew, leḥem (לחם) means bread and often functions metonymically for food itself. Yet importantly, it never intrinsically means meat or flesh. 

Whenever the Hebrew Bible wishes to specify flesh foods, it turns instead to entirely different vocabulary, particularly basar (בשר). The distinction is consistent and foundational.

Aramaic preserves the same semantic structure. Jewish Aramaic, Syriac, and related dialects use laḥmāʾ (לחמא / ܠܚܡܐ) for bread or staple nourishment. Ugaritic follows the same pattern. So too does Classical Ethiopic Geʿez, whose cognate form leḥem (ልሕም) continues to signify bread specifically or food or sustenance broadly. Arabic stands almost entirely alone in defining laḥm as “meat.”

In Classical Arabic and Modern Standard Arabic, laḥm (لَحْم) refers specifically to meat. Bread is no longer represented by the inherited Semitic root at all, but instead by khubz (خُبْز), a term associated with later lexical developments shaped in part by Persian and broader Indo-Iranian linguistic influence. This means Arabic is effectively the sole major Semitic language in which the ancient L-Ḥ-M root underwent semantic narrowing from general nourishment to flesh or meat specifically.

So Why Does Arabic Call Meat Laḥm While Other Semitic Language Calls Bread Leḥem? What makes this particularly striking is how little sustained scholarly attention the anomaly has received. Given the overwhelming consistency of the root across the Semitic linguistic world, one would expect the Arabic divergence to have become a central case study in Semitic philology and historical semantics. Yet........

© Eurasia Review