Opinion: Who really pays the price of dual-practice health care? The recently introduced Bill 11 in Alberta has sparked intense debate about the future of universal health care in Canada.
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
The recently introduced Bill 11 in Alberta has sparked intense debate about the future of universal health care in Canada.
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Many argue that expanding private-pay services and allowing dual billing for physicians will erode public access and create a two-tier system of care — one for the wealthy and one for everyone else. In such a system, money buys faster access, while those without means wait longer or go without. This vision stands in stark contrast to the Canadian values of equity and justice.
However, access is already a significant problem in health care in Canada. Canadians wait months — or even years — for medically necessary care. According to the 2025 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) world health report, 50 per cent of Canadians are dissatisfied with access to health services in the country.
Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Headline News will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Interested in more newsletters? © Edmonton Journal
