The Commonwealth isn’t really a power bloc
Some reports suggest an interesting geopolitical twist: King Charles, according to some, wants the United States to join the Commonwealth, and President Donald Trump, ever the wildcard, seems delighted by the prospect. On the surface, it may sound like tabloid stuff—Buckingham Palace meets Mar-a-Lago in a bizarre diplomatic tango. Yet, peel back the layers, and it comes together. In an era where alliances are shifting and old certainties are crumbling, this supposedly oddball idea might just hint at a broader realignment.
The US, under Trump’s somewhat bombastic leadership, is pivoting away from Europe and NATO toward a Pacific-focused future (plus a neo-Monroeist focus on the American continent). This being so, one would expect QUAD, and AUKUS to be its anchors, and enhancing the historically special relationship with Britain, in the post-Brexit world, would be the natural move to make – even though there are doubts about the American leader (largely seen as unreliable) commitment to AUKUS too. In this context, could King Charles, in his quiet manner, be playing mediator to a fracturing North American neighborhood? Moreover it could be part of a series of symbolic gestures to further enhance the British-American partnership.
Let us start with the buzz. Responding to a Daily Mail news report (that the British King would make a secret offer to the American President to become the next associate member of the Commonwealth), Trump shared the news link on his Truth Social account with the words “I Love King Charles. Sounds good to me!”
The Commonwealth, a 56-nation bloc rooted in Britain’s colonial past. Almost all of Britain’s former colonies are now members of the Commonwealth of Nations, with Ireland and the US being notable exceptions. Of the 56, only a minority........
© Blitz
