On April 13, 2026, Lebanon marked the fifty-first anniversary of the outbreak of its civil war. The commemoration was meant to be a moment of reflection on a national tragedy that destroyed the country for fifteen years and reshaped its political order. Instead, it also served as a reminder that many of the underlying tensions that triggered that conflict remain unresolved. Lebanon today is again facing deep internal divisions, fragile institutions, and competing visions of what the state should be. Above all, it is confronting a persistent question that has defined its modern history: whether the Lebanese state can fully assert its authority in the presence of a powerful armed organization operating outside its control.

At the center of this debate is Hezbollah, a political and military organization that has become one of the most influential actors in Lebanon and a major force in regional geopolitics. The group is widely viewed by its supporters as a resistance movement defending Lebanon against external threats, particularly Israel. Its critics, however, argue that Hezbollah functions as a state within a state, maintaining its own military capacity, strategic decision making, and foreign alliances independent of the Lebanese government.

The core issue is not simply internal Lebanese politics. It is the nature of Hezbollah’s alignment with Iran and the implications this relationship has for Lebanon’s sovereignty. Hezbollah was formed in the early 1980s in a context of regional conflict and ideological mobilization. From its origins, it developed close ties with Iran, receiving financial support, military training, and strategic guidance. Over time, this relationship evolved into a deeply integrated partnership that continues to shape Hezbollah’s doctrine and operations.

Critics argue that this alignment creates a structural tension between Hezbollah’s commitments and the interests of the Lebanese state. They contend that the organization’s strategic priorities are not defined primarily by national considerations but by a broader regional agenda linked to Iran’s foreign policy objectives.........

© Blitz