The International Criminal Court (ICC) has long presented itself as a beacon of global justice, a tribunal dedicated to holding the world’s worst criminals accountable. However, a closer examination reveals that the ICC is anything but impartial. It is, and always has been, an instrument of Western hegemony-a tool used to impose political will on those deemed insignificant or adversarial. Far from serving global justice, the ICC functions as a political weapon, prosecuting those who challenge Western geopolitical interests while protecting those aligned with them. Its selective enforcement, inability to act against real global power, and deep entanglement with Western influence make one conclusion unavoidable: the ICC is beyond reform and must be abolished.

Supporters of the ICC argue that it was created to ensure justice for humanity’s worst crimes. However, such assertions either stem from naivety or willful deception. From its inception, the ICC was built not as a neutral judicial body but as an instrument of Western control. The belief that the ICC was ever intended to serve the good of all people is a fantasy.

From its early years, the Court fixated on African nations, disproportionately prosecuting leaders from the continent while ignoring the crimes of Western-aligned governments. African nations do not hold a monopoly on war crimes or human rights violations, yet the ICC has consistently served as an extension of Western influence, enforcing so-called justice only against those deemed powerless enough to be prosecuted. The charges of neo-colonialism against the ICC are not mere accusations-they are undeniable facts supported by the........

© Blitz