As the war continues, Ukrainian men are increasingly looking for ways to protect their rights and avoid being sent to the front lines. Since Ukrainian law severely limits the ability to challenge mobilization, even when conducted with violations, lawyers have turned to international human rights organizations. One of the most significant documents in this struggle is the opinion issued by the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe (VC), which questions the legality of completely denying alternative service during martial law. How has this decision impacted the situation?

Venice Commission’s Stance: The Right to Conscientious Objection Must Be Upheld

In March 2024, the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe issued an official opinion regarding mobilization in Ukraine. This decision was made in response to a request from Ukraine’s Constitutional Court following a case involving a religious believer who refused military service on the grounds of conscience.

Ukrainian courts had previously ruled that alternative civilian service was not possible during mobilization, as the duty to defend the state took precedence over personal beliefs. However, international........

© Blitz