|
Allan E. Barsky PhdPsychology Today |
Assisting patients whose healthcare access and other rights are at risk.
Why recorded sessions were admitted into evidence at the Menendez murder trial.
Legal-ethical distinctions between what clients want and what’s good for them.
Understanding the legal implications of shall, should, may, and prohibited.
Responding to media requests in high-profile cases.
When mental health professionals testify about information shared by clients.
Roles and responsibilities when testifying in court.
Mitigating the risks of malpractice lawsuits.
When mental health professionals terminate work for “their own good”.
Whose responsibility is it to challenge subpoenas?
Providing continuing education in light of anti-DEI laws.
Mental health professionals and the pros and cons of the Goldwater Rule.
Free epression and the law about denying service to potential clients.
Respecting privacy, informed consent, fairness, and integrity.