menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Pike's botched execution renews death penalty scrutiny

45 0
03.10.2026

Pike’s botched execution renews death penalty scrutiny

descriptions off, selected

captions settings, opens captions settings dialog

captions off, selected

This is a modal window.

Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.

End of dialog window.

The Hill's Weekend Headlines — Oct. 2-4, 2026

The Hill's Weekend Headlines — Oct. 2-4, 2026

Tennessee’s botched execution of Christa Pike is renewing scrutiny over how states carry out the death penalty and raising questions about what legal recourse exists when that protocol goes awry.   

The attempt mirrors recent failures in other states, where inmates and their lawyers have argued in court that such errors amount to cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment.  

“What happened here gives attorneys and courts both within and outside of Tennessee a new factual example that they’re certainly going to consider when evaluating any reliability of these procedures and any implications under the Eighth Amendment,” said Paul Lucas, an associate professor of criminal justice at East Carolina University in Greenville, N.C.   

Pike, 50, was sentenced to death a year after confessing to the brutal 1995 torture and murder of 19-year-old Colleen Slemmer, a Jobs Corps classmate, at an abandoned steam plant in Knoxville. 

Pike was set to be executed by lethal injection Wednesday morning, but it was delayed for hours following a last-minute stay by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. That was ultimately lifted by the U.S. Supreme Court over the dissent of the three liberal justices.   

The state’s attempt to execute her that night went disastrously. Witnesses in the death chamber reported Pike was still alive and snoring after being administered two syringes of the lethal injection drug pentobarbital.   

Pike’s case is one of many within the past decade in which executioners either struggled to find a vein or the drugs didn’t work as expected, leading inmates to need additional doses or endure minutes of severe pain before the effects took hold.   

“I think there’s been an assumption that pentobarbital protocols comply with the Constitution,” said Bo King, a capital postconviction attorney based in North Carolina who’s represented dozens of clients on death row and witnessed five executions.   

“That is being challenged by botches like we saw with Ms. Pike,” he said, also pointing to another Tennessee case from last year in which an inmate complained that it was “hurting so bad” minutes after being........

© The Hill