“Criminal appearance” and defendant remorse can affect criminal penalties and leniency.

Stereotypes about criminal faces can impact judgments about guilt and recidivism.

Facial perceptions of remorse may prompt leniency, but it depends on the type of crime.

As a career prosecutor, I have heard it for decades from the jury box as both sides attempt to select a fair and impartial jury: “He looks guilty.” Or upon hearing the charges, “I knew it! He definitely looks like a (fill in the blank).” Statements like these are distinct from assumptions about police procedure, such as the belief that anyone who has been arrested “must be guilty of something.” Conclusions based upon appearances alone before a single piece of evidence has been introduced in court indicate potential predisposition and bias, and are deeply concerning for everyone involved.

Determining When Looks Can Kill

Beth B. Stevens and Heather Kleider-Offutt (2026), in a piece aptly entitled “When Looks Could Kill,” examined the role of suspect appearance in legal outcomes.[i] Investigating the impact of “criminal appearance” and defendant remorse on criminal penalties and leniency, they found that the facial structure of some defendants can prompt biases in parole decisions and beliefs about recidivism.

Stevens and Kleider-Offutt recognize that upon viewing a face, perceivers form first impressions within 500–1,000 milliseconds,........

© Psychology Today