Early wounds sometimes lead people to become especially empathic and care-giving.

Looking at the histories of Holocaust survivors with early wounding, many became especially empathic.

A corrective experience later is important, which can come though a personal contact or spiritual experience.

Across psychology, research has shown that a meaningful subset of people who experienced early abandonment or neglect exhibit heightened compassion, caregiving motivation, and altruism later in life. However, others with an adverse childhood history show opposite symptoms, such as withdrawal, mistrust, or an exaggerated tendency toward self-protection. What matters most is how the early experience was processed and integrated, not merely whether it occurred.

People who experienced early abandonment, understood as the rupture of trust early in life, sometimes become the most attuned, fiercely compassionate adults. Psychology, developmental science, and trauma research have begun to map the mechanisms by which early suffering, under the right conditions, leads to altruism. The psychologist Ervin Staub named this phenomenon: altruism born of suffering. His research, which included studying Holocaust survivors, found that some individuals who endured significant early adversity were more, not less, motivated to ease others' suffering, contrary to what might be expected. If pain is integrated into a coherent personal narrative, it can lead to the formation of a moral compass.

Some of this compassionate attunement has a neurological basis. Children raised in environments of relational unpredictability—where caregiving has been inconsistent or absent—often show heightened vigilance for emotional cues. Their nervous systems become exquisitely attuned to detecting distress in a face or suffering beneath a composed exterior. In clinical settings, therapists often observe surprising empathic accuracy in these clients. The same neural architecture built to protect a child from abandonment in an unstable early environment can, in adulthood, become a profound gift of presence.

But these early experiences often carry psychological costs later in life. Some may struggle with self-care, porous boundaries, and exhaustion from chronic overdoing the impulse to be helpful. However, the person who suffered early abandonment can also evolve over time into a genuinely compassionate individual. Those who experienced abandonment often develop an acute awareness of vulnerability and injustice. They know from the inside out what it means to be excluded, unprotected, and unseen. A moral identity may develop around caring for others.

This is likely to occur when the wounded person is fortunate enough to encounter at least one reliable, caring adult who demonstrates that human connection can be trustworthy. Such a relationship offers a corrective experience. It does not erase the early harm, but it may show that another way is possible. And yet, we cannot romanticize such a pathway. Early abandonment is always associated with significant emotional loss and social risk. In some cases, especially when a corrective experience later in life is completely missing, defensive self-focus and/or antisocial behavior can lead to grave unhappiness for the wounded person and those they encounter.

In the bigger picture, the future of the wounded person cannot be determined. Early abandonment does not reliably produce either compassion or avoidance. Crucially, a safe community is needed at some point later on. The path to healing often includes a period of inner reflection and the willingness to turn toward one's own story with honesty and care. Often, those who were wounded become the kind of helpers they themselves yearned to be aided by and needed most. Sometimes, a connection to what John Makransky and Paul Kondon call a “Field of Care,” a spiritual experience of ease, warmth, and security, provides a reliable, secure foundation for healing and growth, complementing other sources of healing. Those who transform their longing for connection into a commitment to others' well-being are healing their wound.

Staub, E., & Vollhardt, J. (2008). Altruism born of suffering: The roots of caring and helping after victimization and other trauma. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 78(3), 267–280.

Staub, E. (2003). The psychology of good and evil: Why children, adults, and groups help and harm others. Cambridge University Press.

Pollak, S. D., & Tolley-Schell, S. A. (2003). Selective attention to facial emotion in physically abused children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(3), 323–338.

Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 3. Loss: Sadness and Depression. Basic Books. (Original theorization of compulsive caregiving as an attachment strategy.)

Jurkovic, G. J. (1997). Lost childhoods: The plight of the parentified child. Brunner/Mazel. (The definitive research text on parentification.)

Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18.

Park, C. L. (2005). Religion as a meaning-making framework in coping with life stress. Journal of Social Issues, 61(4), 707–729.

Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1992). Overcoming the Odds: High Risk Children from Birth to Adulthood. Cornell University Press. (Landmark resilience research showing the role of at least one reliable adult.)

Condon, P. & Makransky, J, 2020 Sustainable Compassion Training: Integrating Meditation Theory with Psychological Science. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 2249

© Psychology Today