We assume artificial intelligence (AI) and humans share the same scale of intelligence.

Human thought carries lived consequence while AI computation does not.

One ruler may not be able measure two different kinds of thinking.

Every debate about artificial intelligence (AI) seems to revolve around the same question: Is it smarter than we are?

The subtitles of the questions might change, and the endpoints might be argued, but behind the cacophony of authoritative brilliance is a shared assumption—that intelligence lives on a single line. More of it on one end, less on the other. Humans are somewhere along that spectrum, and machines are moving toward us.

But with all the discussion and debate, we rarely stop to examine the ruler itself. And the moment we ask whether AI is ahead of us, we have already accepted that we are measuring the same thing.

The Illusion of a Shared Scale

It’s understandable why we default to this handy ruler. Large language models create the very stuff of our humanity, from words to images. And this output clearly looks like thinking, and it is commonly better than what we humans produce. But let's be careful........

© Psychology Today