Karachi is Pakistan’s only city that pays for the country and gets governed by a system that treats it like every other district. Autonomy for the city of this magnitude requires a constitutional amendment. Generating a huge share of the country’s tax revenue and trade (the port, the stock exchange, the bulk of federal collections); no federal or provincial government would willingly give that up. The mismatch between what Karachi produces and what it’s allowed to reinvest in itself is the core argument why this city should have been declared a city state like yesterday. Sindh was never built to hold Karachi. The province’s political centre of gravity sits in its rural south, where a different electorate, a different set of priorities, and a different relationship to the state have shaped provincial policy for decades. Karachi’s population and economic weight give it a claim on governance that its formal vote share inside Sindh can never fully deliver. The city is permanently outvoted on its own future. City-state status isn’t a radical departure from provincial control so much as a formal recognition of the fragmentation that already exists.

This is not a story about ethnicity, though it gets told that way. It is a story about scale. A metropolis that produces this much and receives this little control over its own land use, transport, and policing is not being mismanaged by Sindh. It is being managed by the wrong instrument entirely. You cannot run a financial capital through the same administrative logic you’d use for a farming district, and expect either to function well.

Look closely at who actually governs Karachi and the picture falls apart immediately. Cantonment boards control some of the city’s most valuable land. Provincial departments control policing.........

© Daily Times