In a significant update on the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic, the CIA has announced that it “assesses with low confidence” that the virus likely originated from a research-related incident, rather than through natural zoonotic transmission. This cautious conclusion, shared on January 25, reflects the agency’s evolving stance on one of the most contentious questions of the global health crisis that has claimed over seven million lives worldwide. While the agency noted that both origin scenarios remain plausible, it emphasized that new data could alter the evaluation.

The revised assessment was made public shortly after the confirmation of John Ratcliffe as the new CIA director, following his nomination by former President Donald Trump. Ratcliffe, a vocal proponent of the lab-leak theory, has repeatedly argued that this explanation aligns with scientific and intelligence evidence, as well as “common sense.” Ratcliffe’s immediate focus on the issue was anticipated, with the new director describing the origins of Covid-19 as a “day-one thing” for his tenure.

According to reports from The Washington Post, the CIA’s updated assessment was finalized before Ratcliffe officially assumed his position. However, it was declassified and publicly disclosed under his directive, signaling a prioritization of transparency in matters involving the pandemic’s origins.

The origins of Covid-19 have been the subject of heated debate and speculation since the outbreak began in Wuhan, China, in late 2019. Broadly, there are two competing theories:

Natural Origin Theory: This widely supported hypothesis suggests that the virus was transmitted from animals to humans, possibly through a wildlife market in Wuhan. Many scientists argue that zoonotic........

© Blitz