|
Zahid HussainDawn |
The Iran war has exposed the limits of America’s military might.
No doubt, it’s a feel-good moment, but it should not divert our focus from critical national challenges.
Tehran has warned that it would retaliate rather than surrender.
Some media reports suggest that there is a strong possibility of a second round of meetings.
The madness of the leader at the helm of the world’s most powerful nation knows no bounds.
Pakistan’s balancing act is becoming tenuous as the scope of the war widens.
There cannot be any meaningful talks under the shadow of war.
Bound by a defence pact with Saudi Arabia, Pakistan is in a precarious position.
The longer the war continues, the more difficult it will be for the US to extricate itself from it.
The US president has continued to shift the stated aims of his military campaign against Iran.
The new files reveal the extent of Epstein’s social network and web of sexual abusers.
The latest terrorist attacks in Balochistan undermine claims that the situation is under control.
A state becomes strong by allowing itself to be held accountable by the people.
The so-called Board of Peace is meant to be used to advance US hegemony.
The unrest in Iran seems to have encouraged the US president to threaten military action.
The US president has pushed the world into extremely dangerous territory.
While Khan’s present personalised campaign against the military leadership cannot be condoned, the treatment meted out to him and his party leaders...
Any move to impose governor’s rule in KP could plunge the country further into crises.
Any action through the proposed 28th amendment will further alienate the people.
Ultimately, the coercive power of the state could not withstand the power of the people.
Legislators’ talk of democracy rings hollow after they killed the spirit of the Constitution.
The proposed amendment is described by some as an expansion of the 26th Amendment.
It is necessary to address the root causes of religious extremism in the country.
The current Taliban administration has raised the Durand Line issue far more aggressively.
The worsening conflict between the two neighbours carries serious implications for regional security.
A number of questions have been raised about the purported Pasni discussions.
The Gaza peace plan has further emboldened Israel.
Trump’s threats of reoccupying Bagram intensified after Kabul’s rejection of any deal.
Muslim states have watched the worst genocide in recent times in silence.
The absence of constitutional rule leads to the strengthening of extractive institutions, which benefits few.
The Tianjin summit reinforced China’s leading role in the emerging international order.
Pak-China relations have not been affected by Islamabad’s improved ties with Washington.
The Alaska meeting has cemented the rapprochement between Russia and the US.
Al-Sharif had been reporting from Gaza since the invasion and knew he was on Israel’s hit list.
Kinetic operations being carried out for over two decades have failed to eradicate militancy.
Historically, the Islamabad-Washington engagement has been framed narrowly.
More than anyone, the Sharif family should know the slippery slope of power politics.
Any move to unseat the KP government through engineering would turn the situation extremely volatile.
There’s something ominous about the centre’s efforts to revive the jirga system in former Fata.
A tamed judiciary makes it easier to further curb democratic and fundamental rights.
Many analysts say that regime change in Iran is still on the Israeli-Trumpian agenda.
The US is now entering a conflict whose outcome it cannot determine.
The decision to elevate diplomatic relations is indeed a positive move.
In the absence of a clear policy and economic framework, the crypto plan appears dubious.
Most troubling for India has been the strengthening of China-Pakistan defence collaboration.
It was once again external intervention that helped stop the conflict between the two countries.
The Indian media’s frenzy cannot be separated from the country’s political climate.
Indian leaders in their hubris seem to forget the perils of military escalation.