A football coach prays quietly at midfield after a game and gets fired for it. Not for disrupting anything. Not for pressuring students. For praying. Alone. On a public field. The Supreme Court, in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District (2022), ruled 6-3 that firing him was unconstitutional. In doing so, the Court formally ended the legal framework that had governed church-state law for 50 years — and that had been used to justify exactly this kind of institutional hostility toward private religious expression.

That framework was the Lemon test. It was already dying. Kennedy buried it. Understanding why matters for anyone who's watched courts and school districts weaponize Establishment Clause doctrine against individual believers rather than protect citizens from government overreach.

The Wall That Wasn't in the Constitution

The First Amendment's Establishment Clause says Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion. For 150 years, it bound only the federal government. In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), the Supreme Court applied it to the states and, while doing so, borrowed Thomas Jefferson's 1802 phrase about "a wall of separation between church and State." Jefferson wasn't at the Constitutional Convention. He was in France when the First Amendment was drafted. His letter wasn't a legal authority. None of that stopped the phrase from becoming constitutional doctrine.

The irony of Everson: the Court announced the harshest possible separationist rule — no tax "in any amount" supporting religious institutions  — and then held that reimbursing Catholic school bus fare was constitutional. Both sides claimed victory. What the Court actually produced was an........

© Townhall