SUNshine Girl Sabrina Shyne

SIMMONS: Stunning decline of Morgan Rielly is near-impossible to explain

Mark Carney expresses some 'regret' after backing U.S. strikes on Iran

WARMINGTON: Case of missing Mississauga mom 'devastating,' husband says

Share this Story : Toronto Sun Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

LILLEY: Who owns Vancouver after agreement with Musqueam Indian Band?

Confusing agreement with federal government covered fishing rights, marine management and territorial rights

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

Has the Mark Carney government handed the ownership of all of Vancouver and much of the surrounding area to the Musqueam Indian Band?

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.

Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.

Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.

Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.

Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.

Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.

Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.

Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.

Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account.

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.

Enjoy additional articles per month.

Get email updates from your favourite authors.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments

Enjoy additional articles per month

Get email updates from your favourite authors

Don't have an account? Create Account

Based on the language in a government news release issued nearly two weeks ago, that would be a logical assumption.

LILLEY: Who owns Vancouver after agreement with Musqueam Indian Band? Back to video

In an agreement that covered fishing rights, marine management and territorial rights, the federal government used language that has many people wondering what just happened. The news release talks about several agreements, but those agreements weren’t released with the news release.

“(An agreement) recognizes that Musqueam has Aboriginal rights including title within their traditional territory and establishes a framework for incremental implementation of rights and nation-to-nation relations with Canada,” said the news release.

At another point, the news release quotes Musqueam Chief Wayne Sparrow asserting title and right to their traditional land and saying the federal government agrees with them.

“In signing these agreements, the government of Canada is acknowledging Musqueam’s Aboriginal title and rights to our traditional territory and recognizing our expertise in both marine management and fisheries management,” Sparrow said.

Agreements a source of confusion

In common law, having right and title to a piece of land denotes ownership.

Between the government statement and the quote in the news release from Sparrow, anyone with any understanding of the way the law works in Canada would be forgiven for thinking the federal government just signed an agreement to grant ownership of all of Vancouver and the surrounding area to the Musqueam Indian Band.

Think of what that would mean for homeowners in the area, for business owners who are concerned about their own right and title to the land they paid for and perhaps what this means for the mortgage they still have on their land.

Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond.

There was an error, please provide a valid email address.

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Your Midday Sun will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.

In light of the Cowichan Tribes v. Canada court case, where a court granted right and title to a different band, that’s not a crazy concern. Already, homeowners in that area are fearful they won’t get their mortgages renewed while ownership is in question.

A big part of the problem is that the Carney government issued this news release about the agreements, but didn’t release the details of the agreements. That leaves everyone looking for more and wondering what it really means.

Deals ‘do not impact private property,’ minister says

The federal minister of Crown-Indigenous relations took to social media to say the agreements won’t impact ownership.

“These agreements do not impact private property,” Rebecca Alty said in a post on X.

“This is preferred to the more uncertain alternative of determining Musqueam’s Aboriginal title through the courts. By negotiating, we are able to uphold existing property rights and advance reconciliation.”

These agreements do not impact private property.This is preferred to the more uncertain alternative of determining Musqueam’s Aboriginal title through the courts. By negotiating we are able to uphold existing property rights and advance reconciliation. https://t.co/MTEzB9DNZC— Rebecca Alty (@RebeccaAltyNWT) March 3, 2026

These agreements do not impact private property.This is preferred to the more uncertain alternative of determining Musqueam’s Aboriginal title through the courts. By negotiating we are able to uphold existing property rights and advance reconciliation. https://t.co/MTEzB9DNZC

In a statement released on Monday, Sparrow said that in his view, the agreements were not about land ownership.

“Musqueam is not coming for anyone’s private property. Our approach to traditional unceded territory is one of partnership and relationship with our neighbours, not trying to take away our neighbours’ private property,” Sparrow said.

The problem is that in choosing to use the term rights and title, the federal government has implied ownership. The 31-page agreement tries to define right and title on page 13 of the agreement.

“’Rights and Title’ means the existing Aboriginal and treaty rights recognized and affirmed by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 and, for greater certainty, includes Aboriginal title and self-government rights,” the document says.

Home, landowners should be concerned

Throughout the document there are several very blunt statements including in section 2.1, which states: “The purposes of this agreement are to: (a) recognize Musqueam’s Rights and Title within Musqueam Territory; (b) demonstrate progress in incrementally implementing Musqueam’s Rights and Title.”

The document goes on to describe how the agreement will honour Musqueam legal tradition and the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. This document, the way it is written, should be of concern to every single homeowner and property owner in Vancouver, West Vancouver, West Burnaby, Richmond and Delta.

Any lawyer worth their salt could gently open up what this agreement says to mean much more than what Sparrow said it does. The words in the agreement go much further and given the nature of our activist courts, this is a major concern for any property owner in British Columbia.

Now, B.C. is different than most of the rest of the country given that there are next to no treaties covering B.C. and much of the province is claimed by one band or another. That isn’t the case in the rest of Canada, where for the most part treaties are long established.

The Carney government said they are trying to provide certainty with this agreement; they may have opened a brand new can of worms.

Pattullo Bridge replacement connecting B.C. cities given First Nation name stal̕əw̓asəm

Burnaby man seeks damages from B.C., Canada over Cowichan Tribes ruling

Share this Story : Toronto Sun Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.

SUNshine Girl Sabrina Shyne Sunshine Girls

SUNshine Girl Sabrina Shyne

SIMMONS: Stunning decline of Morgan Rielly is near-impossible to explain Toronto Maple Leafs

SIMMONS: Stunning decline of Morgan Rielly is near-impossible to explain

SUNshine Girl Kristy Sunshine Girls

Mark Carney expresses some 'regret' after backing U.S. strikes on Iran Canada

Mark Carney expresses some 'regret' after backing U.S. strikes on Iran

WARMINGTON: Case of missing Mississauga mom 'devastating,' husband says Toronto & GTA

WARMINGTON: Case of missing Mississauga mom 'devastating,' husband says

© Toronto Sun