Opinion National Interest PoV 50-Word Edit

ThePrint On Camera Videos In Pictures

Society & Culture Around Town Book Excerpts Vigyapanti The Dating Story

More Judiciary Education YourTurn Work With Us Campus Voice

Opinion National Interest PoV 50-Word Edit

ThePrint On Camera Videos In Pictures

Society & Culture Around Town Book Excerpts Vigyapanti The Dating Story

More Judiciary Education YourTurn Work With Us Campus Voice

The test of Gujarat’s Operation Mule Hunt is not 55 arrests. Count the money instead

Having spent a career watching the state respond to public alarm, I know its reflex: raise enforcement numbers, let the metric substitute for the mission. The syndicates keep a different ledger.

Fifty-five arrests, Rs 802 crore, 22 states. Gujarat Police’s Operation Mule Hunt 2.0 made headlines last week. But the headlines counted the wrong thing.

Look instead at how mule bank accounts were used to channel cyber fraud proceeds. A man in Ahmedabad allegedly registered a bogus firm, opened three bank accounts in its name, and handed them to fraud syndicates. Police linked these three accounts to 253 cybercrime complaints across 22 states and Union Territories, involving over Rs 161 crore. That is the arithmetic of modern cybercrime: one mule account can service crime committed anywhere in India. The fraudster on the phone may be sitting in a compound abroad, but his money must still touch an Indian bank account. That account is the crime’s one fixed address.

This is the fact the public debate keeps missing. What we call cyber fraud is not primarily a technology problem. It is a money-laundering operation wearing a technology mask.

The phone call, the fake arrest, the bogus investment app — these are the collection front, endlessly redesigned and impossible to exhaust. The real enterprise is the plumbing behind it: layer the money through rented........

© ThePrint