Illness, Intimacy, and Artificial Intelligence
Fact-based journalism that sparks the Canadian conversation
Articles Business Environment Health Politics Arts & Culture Society
Special Series Hope You’re Well For the Love of the Game Living Rooms In Other Worlds: A Space Exploration Terra Cognita More special series >
For the Love of the Game
In Other Worlds: A Space Exploration
More special series >
Events The Walrus Talks The Walrus Video Room The Walrus Leadership Roundtables The Walrus Leadership Forums Article Club
The Walrus Video Room
The Walrus Leadership Roundtables
The Walrus Leadership Forums
Subscribe Renew your subscription Change your address Magazine Issues Newsletters Podcasts
Renew your subscription
The Walrus Lab Hire The Walrus Lab Amazon First Novel Award
Amazon First Novel Award
Illness, Intimacy, and Artificial Intelligence
Letters to the editor: March/April 2026
(I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction
I was left unsatisfied and frustrated after reading Cathrin Bradbury’s “What is Sex?” (January/February). No mention was made that a healthy sex life relies on not just affection, attraction, and chemistry, but also intensity. As a heterosexual sixty-seven-year-old woman with a vibrant sex life, I believe sexual intercourse is reliant on getting to a point where you and your partner feel so close emotionally and physically that you lose your sense of individuality, sometimes your ability to speak, and meld into each other. Here is one quote about sex I have tacked to my cork board, from Northern Exposure, when Joel says to Maggie: “I always wanted more. Not frequency; I am not talking about frequency—although that would have been great, too. I wanted more intensity. I wanted to be out there, outside myself, outside my skin. I wanted sex to be like robbing life out of the jaws of death!” They are sitting outside in........
