The Justice Ministry on Sunday announced its intention to pass police’s investigation into the Sde Teiman abuse leak scandal to State Attorney Amit Aisman rather than his boss, Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara, claiming there is still concern she has a conflict of interest in the case.

The move came a month after the High Court of Justice demanded that the ministry’s legal adviser, Yael Kotik, choose a legal official to handle the case, following the police’s completion of a probe into the leak to the media of footage purporting to show reservists severely abusing a Gazan detainee at the Sde Teiman detention facility.

The affair is one aspect of a broader power struggle between Baharav-Miara and Justice Minister Yariv Levin, who accuses the attorney general of having a conflict of interest in the case after her office oversaw an internal probe that recommended not opening a criminal investigation into the leak’s source.

That source ended up being revealed as ex-military advocate general Maj. Gen. Yifat Tomer-Yerushalmi, who admitted to the leak.

Last fall, Levin demanded that he be allowed to select someone from outside the state prosecution to oversee the investigation. The probe was ongoing at the time, with Baharav-Miara’s role still an open question, and the court granted his request.

While judges allowed Levin to pick a supervisor, they rejected both of his nominees, since neither met the guidelines set out in their ruling.

After completing the investigation, police passed a summary of their findings to the Justice Ministry and requested that Baharav-Miara be allowed to supervise the case, saying they had ruled her out as a suspect in the affair.

Levin has nevertheless continued to insist on excluding the attorney general, and the case file sat idle in the Justice Ministry for a month.

Kotik wrote in her opinion submitted to the High Court that Aisman’s involvement in the initial, fallacious probe was limited. “As such… he is the most senior official in the system to whom the investigative materials can be transferred for review,” she said.

“Regarding the attorney general, it was determined that members of her office oversaw the investigative team in the Military Advocate General’s office, whose role was to examine the source of the information leak,” she continued, arguing that the link raised concern about a conflict of interest.

The Movement for Quality Government in Israel — the civil society group that filed the petition urging the High Court to force Kotik’s hand — rejected her plan to pass the case to Aisman, accusing her of acting to serve the political interests of Levin and the right-wing ruling coalition.

“Kotik is not authorized to review investigation material, is not a prosecutor under the law, and is herself in a serious conflict of interest due to her personal ties with the justice minister,” the group said in a statement.

The group further claimed that the manner in which Kotik reached her decision, “after repeatedly demanding access to investigation material without authority [to do so], only strengthens the concern that she is acting to serve political interests rather than the public interest.”

Baharav-Miara has come into a series of confrontations with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s right-wing coalition, which is seeking to oust her from her post. It has announced her firing under a newly introduced legal method, but the High Court has annulled the process and demanded that the established mechanism be used.

The government has accused the attorney general of serially thwarting its will over policy, appointments and legislation, and asserts that it can no longer work effectively with her, while Baharav-Miara has argued she has simply been demarcating what the government can and cannot do under the law.

Are you relying on The Times of Israel for accurate and timely coverage of the Iran war right now? If so, please join The Times of Israel Community. For as little as $6/month, you will:

Support our independent journalists who are working around the clock under difficult conditions to cover this conflict;

Read ToI with a clear, ads-free experience on our site, apps and emails; and

Gain access to exclusive content shared only with the ToI Community, including weekly letters from founding editor David Horovitz.

We’re really pleased that you’ve read X Times of Israel articles in the past month.

You clearly find our careful reporting of the Iran war valuable, at a time when facts are often distorted and news coverage often lacks context.

Your support is essential to continue our work. We want to continue delivering the professional journalism you value, even as the demands on our newsroom have grown dramatically during this ongoing conflict.

So today, please consider joining our reader support group, The Times of Israel Community. For as little as $6 a month you'll become our partners while enjoying The Times of Israel AD-FREE, as well as accessing exclusive content available only to Times of Israel Community members.

Thank you,David Horovitz, Founding Editor of The Times of Israel

1 Netanyahu tells Iranians freedom is near as Israel hits Iran’s oil depots for first time

2 Black clouds over Tehran rain down oil drops after Israel strikes oil facilities

3 6 wounded by shrapnel, 1 seriously, as Iran fires suspected cluster warhead missile at Israel

4 Saudi Arabia has told Iran to stop attacks, warned of possible retaliation, sources say

5 AnalysisCracks emerge in Iran’s leadership as it reels under a war seen as existential

6 UAE tugboat hit by explosion, sinks in Strait of Hormuz; 3 Indonesian crew missing

7 Leaks alleging UAE strike on Iran spark Emirati fury, fear of fallout in Israel

8 Two IDF soldiers killed in Hezbollah attack in southern Lebanon

Movement for Quality Government in Israel

High Court of Justice

© The Times of Israel