India and Israel make an improbable pair on paper: one a 1.4 billion-strong continental democracy navigating strategic autonomy, the other a small, besieged nation in permanent geopolitical contest. Yet their science and technology partnership, formalised in 1993, has quietly deepened into one of the more productive bilateral relationships either country maintains. Defence cooperation is well-documented. Trade has grown. Diplomatic warmth is genuine. What has received far less attention is the innovation layer – the joint research, the institutional collaboration, the shared intellectual infrastructure that ultimately determines whether two countries are genuine technology partners or merely trade partners who happen to share a defence vendor.

That innovation layer is now at an inflection point, because across much of the world, a tax is being levied on it. Not a tariff. Not a formal sanction. An ideological tax: the cost imposed on scientific collaboration when political sentiment hardens into institutional policy, when academic gatekeepers align their grant approvals, conference invitations, and partnership decisions with a political position rather than a scientific one. This tax is real. It distorts the allocation of research capital. It forecloses collaborations that would otherwise occur. And it is now being collected at a scale, and in places, that no one predicted even three years ago.

The critical question for India is not whether to acknowledge the tax. It is whether to pay it.

The Global Tax Collector

Since October 2023, European higher education has undergone a rapid, institution-by-institution withdrawal from Israeli academic partnerships. Israeli participation in Horizon Europe hits record low. Universities in Norway, Belgium, Spain, Ireland, and the Netherlands have formally severed or suspended ties. Academic boycott incidents have risen sixty-six percent year-on-year. What was once a fringe position, concentrated in postcolonial faculties and student activist networks, has become the operational norm across a large swath of Western European research institutions.

European academia is, in other words, paying the ideological tax in full. And the tax is not costless. Israeli research institutions – the Weizmann Institute, the Technion, Hebrew University, the Tel Aviv University system – are among the world’s most productive per capita generators of deep technology. They produce disproportionate output in semiconductors, agricultural biotechnology, water technology, cybersecurity, medical devices, and applied AI. When European institutions withdraw from these partnerships, they are not making a frictionless moral gesture. They are forfeiting collaborations of real scientific and commercial value. The ideology extracts its toll from both sides of the severed relationship, but the toll falls unevenly, and Europe is paying more than it acknowledges.

India has not withdrawn. Indian institutions have moved in the opposite direction. IITs have deepened partnerships in robotics, AI, and applied defence research. Israel Aerospace Industries signed a corporate social responsibility agreement with IIT Delhi in early 2024. When a private Indian university was urged to cancel the invitation of a senior Israeli academic in early 2025, the episode........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)