Strategic Calculus, Systemic Risk, and the Mispricing of the World’s Most Important Waterway

As the Iran conflict enters its fifth week, President Trump faces the most consequential strategic decision since the war began — and it has nothing to do with bombs. According to the Wall Street Journal, Trump has privately told aides he is willing to end the military campaign even if the Strait of Hormuz remains largely closed. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that reopening the strait is not among the “core objectives” of the operation. This is not merely a military posture. It is a calculated strategic withdrawal from the most expensive component of the campaign — and it fundamentally reprices every assumption the global economy has been trading on since late February.

The military campaign has achieved substantial destruction of Iranian missile infrastructure, naval capacity, and nuclear enrichment facilities. Netanyahu himself declared Iran “decimated.” But the Strait of Hormuz — through which roughly 20 per cent of global seaborne oil normally transits — remains functionally closed, with daily vessel traffic collapsing from over 130 ships to fewer than six. Trump appears willing to pocket the military gains and defer the strait problem indefinitely, outsourcing it to a coalition of allies he believes should have been securing their own energy supply lines all along.

There is a case — and Trump’s defenders are already making it — that this is rational statecraft. America produces more oil than any country on earth. It imports primarily from Canada and, increasingly, Venezuela. Its domestic gas market is largely insulated from the Hormuz chokepoint. Why, the argument runs, should American troops seize a waterway that principally serves Chinese, Indian, Japanese, and South Korean energy imports? If those nations want the strait open, let them pay for it. This is the transactional logic that has defined Trump’s foreign policy since his first term, and on its own narrow terms it is internally coherent. The problem is that the global economy does not operate on narrow terms.

The market has not priced in this........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)