Judaism’s Epistemic Virtue and the Crisis of Rabbinic Authority

There is an uncomfortable question that the Orthodox Jewish world desperately needs to ask: What happens when rabbis stop pursuing truth? Not when a rabbi makes an honest mistake, which is inevitable for any human being, but when rabbinic authority becomes so invested in protecting its own conclusions that facts, evidence, history, science, and even reason itself become subordinate to institutional loyalty. Judaism has an ancient answer, and it is not particularly flattering to those who demand obedience at the expense of truth. The Torah does not tell us to worship authority. It commands us to pursue truth.

The Jewish tradition begins with an extraordinary proposition: “The seal of the Holy One, blessed be He, is truth,” chotamo shel HaKadosh Baruch Hu emet (Shabbat 55a). Truth is therefore not simply a desirable character trait. It is associated with the very nature of God. The Psalmist declares, “Your Torah is truth” (Psalms 119:142). If Torah is truth, then a Torah culture that becomes frightened of facts, hostile to questions, or dependent upon intellectual conformity has created a contradiction at the heart of its own religious mission.

The Talmud should be enough to cure us of the fantasy that Judaism was ever founded upon unquestioning obedience to rabbis. Open almost any page of the Gemara and one finds disagreement: Rabbi Akiva against Rabbi Ishmael, Beit Hillel against Beit Shammai, Abaye against Rava, one sage challenging another, one interpretation being dismantled and reconstructed by the next. The Talmud did not erase disagreement. It preserved it. It did not conceal the arguments of those who ultimately lost the halakhic debate. It recorded them for posterity because the process of thinking was itself part of Torah.

This is one of Judaism’s great intellectual achievements, and one of the great ironies of contemporary Jewish life is that some rabbis appear increasingly uncomfortable with it. They want the authority of the sages without the intellectual culture of the sages. They want the reverence without the argument. They want the obedience without the questions. But the rabbinic tradition was not built on the assumption that a rabbi is incapable of being wrong. It was built on the assumption that human beings must struggle with truth.

There is a profound difference between rabbinic authority and rabbinic infallibility. Judaism recognizes the former. It has never granted the latter to every rabbi who acquires a title, a reputation, a yeshiva position, or a large following. A rabbi may be an extraordinary talmudist and know very little about economics. He may be a brilliant halakhist and know very little about medicine, psychology,........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)