menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Somaliland Chose Taiwan and Israel: The Case for Trust and a Wider Partnership

34 0
yesterday

Somaliland’s choices under pressure demonstrate reliability and resilience while Taiwan’s practical record and Israeli recognition create the basis for a productive partnership beyond maritime security.

Somaliland chose Taiwan when doing so invited pressure from China. It chose Israel knowing that recognition would provoke opposition from Mogadishu and other governments. Jerusalem should consider those choices together. They reveal a partner willing to stand by a considered national decision when the easier course would be to retreat.

Taiwan’s experience gives Israel something more useful than an assurance of friendship. It provides a record. Since the two sides opened representative offices in 2020, their relationship has survived intimidation and a change of government while developing into cooperation in healthcare, agriculture, technology, commerce and maritime affairs.

Israel’s recognition in December 2025 made a different contribution. It broke a longstanding diplomatic barrier and acknowledged the statehood Somaliland had spent decades exercising. Somaliland accepted that opening and has pursued the relationship through high-level diplomacy and security cooperation.

The next task is to connect recognition to the productive work that makes a partnership last. Israel should match Taiwan’s consistency, exceed its contribution where Israeli capabilities justify doing so and work with Taipei where joint action would serve Somaliland better. Three small democracies can build a partnership whose influence comes from what they accomplish together, extending well beyond Red Sea security.

Somaliland has a record on which trust can be built

Somaliland’s reliability did not begin with its Taiwan relationship. Its 35-year experience since restoring its independence in 1991 has involved rebuilding institutions and maintaining self-government through prolonged diplomatic exclusion. Israeli recognition arrived only near the end of that period.

That history is very important to note because it demonstrates persistence without the normal advantages of international acceptance. Somaliland continued developing a political order while waiting for recognition. Its difficulties are real, but so is the endurance that brought it to this point.

In November 2024, voters elected opposition leader Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi Irro to replace the incumbent. The election result showed that national leadership could change through the ballot. The Taiwan relationship continued under the new administration.

For Israel, that continuity is consequential. A friendship that survives a transfer of power has a stronger foundation than an arrangement resting entirely on personal ties between leaders. Hargeisa’s conduct suggests that certain foreign-policy choices have become part of a broader national direction.

Trustworthiness cannot be proved by a single diplomatic decision. It develops through repeated conduct. Somaliland’s persistence with Taiwan, its pursuit of Israeli recognition and its long commitment to self-government together make a serious case for confidence.

I see principle in the insistence that Somaliland should choose its partners for itself. I see resilience in its willingness to bear the consequences. Israel should take that record seriously when deciding how much political effort and productive investment to commit.

Taiwan was a choice Somaliland defended

Beijing opposed the Somaliland–Taiwan relationship from its beginnings. A Foreign Policy Research Institute analysis in 2020 described reported Chinese development offers conditioned on Hargeisa abandoning its emerging partnership with Taipei. Somaliland proceeded with the representative offices.

In a July 2026 commentary, Michael Rubin reported, citing Somaliland and Taiwanese officials, that assistance exceeding a quarter of a billion dollars had been offered and refused. The amount remains an attributed account. The continuing partnership is the clearest public evidence that Chinese pressure failed to secure the outcome Beijing wanted.

For a country with substantial development needs, rejecting assistance tied to surrendering diplomatic choice is meaningful. Somaliland decided that its relationship with Taiwan had value beyond the immediate financial inducement. Jerusalem should recognize the significance of that judgment.

Pressure also reached the movement of people. In April 2025, Somalia’s civil aviation authority notified airlines that Taiwanese passports and travel documents would no longer be........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)