menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

When the Bishop Defended Yeshivot

54 0
15.04.2026

As government sought to fit Britain’s yeshivot into a regulatory framework designed for schools, an unexpected defender emerged in the House of Lords: the Bishop of Manchester, who understood that a yeshivah is not a failed school, but a different moral and educational world.

At nearly ten o’clock on a winter evening in the House of Lords, one of the clearest public defences of Britain’s yeshivot came not from a rabbi, a Jewish communal spokesman, or a campaigner, but from the Bishop of Manchester.

He rose to warn that a proposed legal definition of “full-time education” risked misclassifying institutions devoted solely to religious instruction. In the midst of a debate clouded by bureaucracy, suspicion, and the habits of the modern regulatory state, he grasped something simple but profound: a yeshiva is not merely a school with too little secular study. It is a different kind of institution altogether.

For much of the past year, parts of Britain’s Charedi community had pursued the issue of under-16 yeshiva education in a highly visible and often troubled way, with protests outside Parliament reflecting a deep sense that there was no meaningful route through to government. The argument had become stuck in a weary cycle of accusation and mistrust. On one side stood policymakers, officials, and campaigners convinced they were confronting educational neglect. On the other stood religious communities convinced that the state neither understood them nor particularly wished to.

The shift began when the issue was reframed not merely as an educational or regulatory dispute, but as a question of religious liberty. It began to be raised in Parliament through the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Freedom of Religion or Belief under the Coalition for Jewish Values banner, before the Bishop of Manchester later took it up in the House of Lords. That helped move the issue out of a narrow bureaucratic frame and into a broader constitutional and moral one.

Then, unexpectedly, the Bishop of Manchester altered the atmosphere.

This was not entirely accidental. Bishop David Walker’s residence lies close to Bury New Road, the main corridor running through the heart of Manchester’s Orthodox Jewish areas, and the Greater Manchester Faith and Community Leaders Forum meets regularly at his home, bringing together senior representatives of the region’s religious communities. He was therefore not approaching the issue as a distant observer, still less as an ideological partisan. He knew enough of the community, and enough of religious life more........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)