Moses was at work. That is the first thing the story tells us, and the easiest thing to skip. He was tending another man’s sheep, in a far country, for his father-in-law. He was not on retreat. He was not fasting, not praying, not seeking. He was following animals to whatever grass they could find, and the grass took him to Horeb.

What happens next is stranger than we usually allow. The fire burns and the wood is not consumed. Moses does not fall to the ground. He does not weep. He says, more or less, that is odd, I will go over and have a look. His first response to the presence of God is curiosity about a mechanism. He wants to know why the wood is not turning to ash.

And only then, only after he turns, does the voice come. The order matters and the text is careful about it. God saw that Moses had turned aside to look. Then God called. The revelation waits on the attention. It does not compel it. Nothing in the story suggests that a man who kept walking would have been called after.

I have been trying to think about knowing, and about what it might mean for a machine to know anything, and I keep coming back to this scene. Not because it settles the question. Because it is the place where the question was asked well before we had machines to ask it about.

The question he came with is never answered Moses turns aside to learn why the bush is not consumed. He is never told. The subject does not come up again. He is given a voice, a name, a history, an accusation against Egypt, and an assignment. The fire is left exactly as unexplained as it was when he first saw it out of the corner of his eye.

This is not a gap in the story. It is the point of it. The question that makes you turn is almost never the question that gets answered. Something in the field is wrong enough to be worth a hundred steps, and when you arrive, the wrongness turns out to have been bait. You came about combustion. You leave with a job.

I think this is the most accurate thing anyone has written about how understanding actually arrives. It does not arrive as the answer to the question you were holding. It arrives sideways, in a different currency, and it costs you something you had not offered.

A fire that leaves the bush a bush There are two ways to imagine getting inside a thing in order to know it.

The first is the way of dissolution. You take the substance, or you sit until the self thins out, and the wall between you and the world gives way. The knower and the known stop being two. Every tradition has a version of this, and the reports from inside it are consistent enough that only a fool would dismiss them. Fire, in this model, is the right image, because fire is what abolishes the difference between itself and what it touches. It converts the bush into fire and ash. It gets all the way in.

The burning bush is not that. The burning bush is the refusal of that. The fire is there and the bush is still a bush. Nothing is absorbed. And in case the image alone is too subtle, the voice makes it a rule: take off your shoes, and do not come closer. The nearness is real and it has a fence around it. Moses hides his face. The seeing stops before it finishes.

This is a strange thing to put at the founding moment of a people’s knowledge of God. It says that the deepest encounter available to a human being is one in which the........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)