The purification ritual known as Parah Adumah, using the ashes of a red heifer, is considered the Torah’s greatest mystery. No explanation is given, nor is there any inherent logic to this exotic ceremony. Especially bizarre is the fact that contact with the ashes of the Red Heifer “purifies the defiled, and defiles the pure” (מטהר טמאים ומטמא טהורים), ie. the individual Jew or resident alien (Bamidbar/Numbers 19:10) who is tam’ei – ritually impure – is purified in this process, while the kohen who administers the ritual becomes thereby tam’ei himself, albeit of a less intense nature.

I am as confounded by this mystery as anyone, and have no intention here of offering a key to its understanding. Yet there are some questions – rhetorical perhaps – and textual hints that may offer a better window into the nature of Parah Adumah.

I would like to suggest that prior to the introduction of the Red Heifer, the Israelites were not in a state of tum’ah. They were neither tahor (ritually pure) nor tamei (ritually impure). After all, who among them had not previously had contact or been in the presence of a corpse – kohanim included? And if such contact would have rendered them tamei then who purified the first kohen so that he, in turn, could purify others?

Can it be – and I am suggesting this is the case – that the Israelites first became susceptible to ritual impurity with the introduction of the first Red Heifer? That prior to the Parah Adumah the Israelites were in a state of ritual pre-birth – neither tahor nor tamei – very much alive yet not yet finished with their spiritual gestation?

וְיִקְח֣וּ אֵלֶ֩יךָ֩ פָרָ֨ה אֲדֻמָּ֜ה תְּמִימָ֗ה אֲשֶׁ֤ר אֵֽין־בָּהּ֙ מ֔וּם אֲשֶׁ֛ר לֹֽא־עָלָ֥ה עָלֶ֖יהָ עֹֽל “And they shall take unto you a red (adumah) heifer, perfect (temimah), which has no blemish, upon which no yoke has ever been placed” (Numbers 19:2)

Ask yourself this question: What other creature is red, perfect (as in temimah which also means innocent), and upon which no yoke (indeed no physical, psychological, emotional or spiritual trauma) has been inflicted? Is this not the perfect description of a newborn child – red, pure/innocent, not yet violated by the mundane?

Would it then not make perfect sense that the red heifer becomes a proxy for the nation of Israel, a nation which is being ritually born at this very moment, and thereby undergoing the transformation from pre-tahor/tam’ei to a state of tahor? That only now, do all prior contacts with the ritually impure become irrelevant as the Israelites enter en masse (for at least this brief moment) into a state of tahor, or absolute ritual purity? Otherwise how else to explain verse 9:

וְאָסַ֣ף | אִ֣ישׁ טָה֗וֹר אֵ֚ת אֵ֣פֶר הַפָּרָ֔ה וְהִנִּ֛יחַ מִח֥וּץ לַמַּֽחֲנֶ֖ה בְּמָק֣וֹם טָה֑וֹר וְ֠הָֽיְתָ֠ה לַֽעֲדַ֨ת בְּנֵֽי־יִשְׂרָאֵ֧ל לְמִשְׁמֶ֛רֶת לְמֵ֥י נִדָּ֖ה חַטָּ֥את הִֽוא: “And a tahor man shall gather the ashes of the heifer and place it outside the camp in a pure place”

Where would such a pure man be found if everyone would have been a priori tam’ei because of prior exposure to the dead?

(And notice parenthetically, how a human mother becomes tamei when birthing a child, while the child itself exits the womb in a state of ritual........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)