In my previous analysis of the Pickaxe Mountain facility, I outlined the immense tactical hurdles facing a conventional assault. We established that the most desirable outcome, a “top-down” solution, is a campaign of precision deep-penetration bombs, akin to the strategy employed against Fordow.

This relies on two critical variables: perfect intelligence pinpointing the complex’s structural vulnerabilities, and a virtually unlimited arsenal of Massive Ordnance Penetrators (GBU-57s), a resource the United States strictly does not possess in infinite supply.

Should those conditions fail to materialize, we are forced to the alternative conclusion: the only way to resolve the mountain is from the inside out. This demands a high-risk ground insertion by special operations forces to conduct an internal demolition or to render the facility inoperable by contaminating the environment with the very uranium they are processing.

However, my initial analysis of this ground-assault phase contained a significant, unexamined assumption. I posited that once inside, a special operations team could simply “demolish the interior.” In reconsidering this, I have come to an honest geological realization: the interior of the mountain is itself solid, monolithic granite, with unknown dimensions. I must admit I previously did not consider the practical how.

There is simply no precedent in mining or military engineering for the catastrophic collapse of a massive, deep-seated granite cavern using conventional explosives in a combat timeframe. Conventional mining demolitions are executed in far less resistant strata, such as coal seams, sandstone, or limestone, where controlled fractures can facilitate material extraction.

Against monolithic granite, an assault team of thirty operators cannot carry the logistical tonnage required to pulverize millions of tons of rock.

Given that a........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)