menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Fertiliser Faultline

10 0
latest

India’s fertiliser system is often discussed as an issue of subsidy, efficiency, or environmental overuse. It is, in fact, something more fundamental: a geopolitical dependence disguised as agricultural policy. The current disruption of shipping routes near the Strait of Hormuz has merely exposed what has long been true ~ India’s food security is tethered to distant conflicts it does not control. For decades, policymakers have treated fertiliser availability as a logistical challenge rather than a strategic vulnerability. Yet the numbers tell a different story.

India imports the bulk of its natural gas ~ the critical input for urea production ~ and relies heavily on Gulf-linked supply chains. When these routes falter, the consequences ripple quickly from ports to plants to farms. The immediate reassurance from the government is that stocks are sufficient for the coming sowing season. That may well be true. But this is precisely how systemic risks are misunderstood: by focusing on adequacy in the present rather than resilience over time. A buffer stock is not a strategy; it is a pause. What lies beneath the surface is more revealing. Fertiliser plants are already operating below optimal capacity due to constrained gas supplies. Global prices are rising. Subsidy burdens are set to increase. None of these trends trigger immediate alarm in isolation, but together they point to a tightening system with limited flexibility. There is also a quieter, more uncomfortable reality. India’s agricultural model is structurally dependent on high fertiliser use, particularly urea.

In regions like Punjab and Haryana, over-application has become routine. This creates a paradox: short-term supply disruptions may not immediately hurt yields because farmers have been using more than necessary. But this “buffer through excess” is neither efficient nor sustainable. It masks vulnerability rather than reducing it. The deeper risk, therefore, is not a sudden collapse in output but a gradual erosion of stability. If supply disruptions persist beyond a few weeks, farmers may begin to alter planting decisions. Input costs could rise. Credit cycles may tighten. Food prices, often driven as much by expectations as by actual shortages, could begin to climb. Inflation, once triggered, rarely respects sectoral boundaries. What this moment demands is not reactive management but structural rethinking. Diversifying import sources is a start, but it does not address the core issue of dependence. Expanding domestic production helps, but only if energy security is simultaneously addressed.

More importantly, India must confront the political economy of fertiliser itself ~ where subsidies distort usage patterns and discourage efficiency. This is not merely an agricultural issue. It is a question of how a major economy positions itself in an era of fractured global supply chains. The lesson from the current disruption is clear: food security cannot rest on assumptions of uninterrupted trade. India is not yet in crisis. But it is uncomfortably close to a threshold where external shocks translate into internal strain. The real test is whether this warning is treated as an anomaly ~ or as a signal to rethink the foundations of agricultural policy itself

Rajasthan gears up to expand into new growth horizons with global outreach

Overcoming geographical, climatic, and ecological constraints imposed by nature, Rajasthan’s agriculture is gearing up to expand into new growth horizons with the Global Rajasthan Agritech Meet (GRAM) 2026.

India-US trade deal: ‘Zero tariffs on several Indian agri products in US, no concession for American items’

American liquid milk, powder, cream, yogurt, buttermilk, butter, ghee, butter oil, paneer and cheese will not get entry into India.

‘Fadnavis has no right to speak on NCP merger’: Sharad Pawar, says no ‘political discussions’ between factions

Nationalist Congress Party (Sharadchandra Pawar) chief Sharad Pawar on Wednesday said that discussions on a possible merger of the two NCP factions were held between Ajit Pawar and Jayant Patil, and not with Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis.

You might be interested in

US-Israel-Iran LIVE Updates: Trump sets one-week marker on Iran talks; White House floats Arab funding

US-Israel-Iran LIVE Updates: Trump sets one-week marker on Iran talks; White House floats Arab funding

The timing is the story: Hegseth-linked broker explored defence ETF before Iran strikes, says report

The timing is the story: Hegseth-linked broker explored defence ETF before Iran strikes, says report

Attack on UN peacekeepers in Lebanon sparks global alarm; India condemns, France seeks emergency UNSC meet

Attack on UN peacekeepers in Lebanon sparks global alarm; India condemns, France seeks emergency UNSC meet


© The Statesman