“All history is contemporary history,” wrote the Italian philosopher and historian Benedetto Croce. His insight was not that the past changes with every generation, but that every generation returns to the past because it confronts new questions in the present. History is therefore neither an exercise in nostalgia nor a catalogue of bygone events. It is the discipline through which societies examine inherited experience in order to understand present challenges and imagine future possibilities.

India has entered the third decade of the 21st century amidst extraordinary  political energy. Yet there is also an unmistakable unease. Public debate is increasingly dominated by personalities rather than principles, electoral calculations rather than long-term vision, and immediate political contestation rather than larger civilisational questions. Political discussion often culminates in the fortunes of governments and parties, as though  politics begins and ends with the acquisition of power. A historian, however, is compelled to ask a different question. Is politics merely about forming governments, or is it fundamentally about shaping the priorities of society?

This distinction is more than semantic. Politics does not simply determine who governs. It also determines which questions a society considers important, which institutions it chooses to strengthen, which values it rewards, and what kind of inheritance it leaves for future generations. Governments change; national priorities shape generations. Every political age therefore does more than respond to the challenges of its own time; it silently prepares the agenda for the next.

History repeatedly reminds us that nations are not judged only by the governments they elect or the leaders they produce. They are judged equally by the aspirations they cultivate, the institutions they build, and the public virtues they encourage. A mature democracy must therefore be assessed not merely by the regularity of its elections but by the quality of its priorities. The true measure of politics is not whether it succeeds in bringing a particular party to power.

It is whether it enlarges the intellectual, moral and institutional horizons of society. India’s freedom movement illustrates this distinction with remarkable clarity. To interpret it merely as a struggle against British rule is to overlook its deeper historical achievement. Its greatest success lay in transforming the political consciousness of millions. Bal Gangadhar Tilak carried politics beyond the confines of educated elites into the public sphere.

Mahatma Gandhi transformed politics into an ethical and participatory enterprise in which ordinary citizens became active makers of history. Subhas Chandra Bose represented another powerful strand of the freedom movement, emphasising national resolve, disciplined organisation and uncompromising commitment to independence. These approaches differed in method, yet together they expanded the political imagination of the nation. Great........

© The Statesman