In international politics, peace is often proclaimed long before it is achieved. Tactical pauses are celebrated as historic breakthroughs, ceasefires are mistaken for durable settlements, and carefully staged diplomatic moments are projected as evidence of statesmanship. This tendency creates an illusion of global peace — a deceptive calm that masks unresolved conflicts and postpones the hard political work required for genuine reconciliation.

Recent claims by US President Donald Trump that his leadership has halted or de-escalated as many as eight global conflicts exemplify this phenomenon. While such assertions may resonate in an era of headline-driven diplomacy, a closer examination reveals a significant gap between rhetorical peace and substantive conflict resolution.

Finding Winter’s Magic in the Heart of AlUla

At best, three or four contemporary cases can even loosely be cited — and none qualify as sustainable peace settlements.

Take the Israel–Hamas war in Gaza. Hostilities have indeed subsided, but not because of a negotiated political settlement or a credible mediation effort. The relative calm is better explained by Israeli military fatigue, the........

© The Nation