menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Trump: UK's Starmer has 'plenty of time to recover' after 'really bad' ambassador pick

6 0
tuesday

Trump: UK’s Starmer has ‘plenty of time to recover’ after ‘really bad’ ambassador pick

President Trump went after British Prime Minister Keir Starmer over his former U.K. ambassador to the U.S., Peter Mandelson, who has faced scrutiny over files linked to the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

“Prime Minister Keir Starmer of the United Kingdom acknowledged that he ‘exercised wrong judgment’ when he chose his Ambassador to Washington. I agree, he was a really bad pick. Plenty of time to recover, however!” Trump said in a late-night Truth Social post on Monday.

In the House of Commons on Monday, Starmer said he “should not have appointed” Mandelson, adding that he took “responsibility for that decision.”

“I apologize, again, to the victims of the pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who were clearly failed by my decision,” the prime minister added.

Mandelson was arrested in February as he faced scrutiny over files linked to Epstein. He was fired from his role as ambassador last September as he dealt with pressure because of his alleged ties to the disgraced financier.

The former ambassador’s relationship with Epstein had also been documented in files released by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee last year, where he called the convicted sex offender his “best pal.”

Last Friday, Starmer said he was “furious” that he was unaware that Mandelson had failed his security vetting before becoming ambassador.

Trump has also faced scrutiny over his relationship with Epstein, and his administration has faced heavy pressure in the past year to release files related to the financier. The president indicated last week that he was open to the chance of public hearings in Congress with Epstein survivors.

“I’m OK with it,” Trump told reporters Thursday. “I think we’ve had a lot of public hearings. I’m OK with it, but I understand that the women didn’t want to go under oath. That’s what I heard that the women, the victims or whatever, they refused to go under oath, which was a little surprising.”

The Hill has reached out to Starmer’s office for comment.

Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

More International News

Cruz: Schumer will shut down government weeks before midterms

Patel gets in shouting match with reporter as he defends job performance

Virginia voters approve redistricting measure backed by Democrats

Live results: Virginia voters weigh redistricting referendum

Walz: ‘Next Democratic president better figure out a way to get universal ...

Watchdog requests Patel’s calendar, security detail messages

Cuban says ‘no’ when asked if he wants Harris to run for president in 2028

House Republican on Patel reported alcohol use: ‘As long as it doesn’t ...

Trump extends Iran ceasefire indefinitely, in an about-face

Emmer warns Ilhan Omar will ‘be held accountable’ if found to have ...

Mejia sworn in, filling Sherrill’s seat and further narrowing GOP House ...

DOJ charges Southern Poverty Law Center with fraud amid denials from civil ...

Senate Republicans hope Supreme Court ‘surprise’ could help save majority

Resignation is Trump’s last chance at redemption

Warsh declines to say whether Biden won 2020 election

Tucker Carlson ‘sorry for misleading people’ with Trump support

Roy unveils immigration bill dubbed ‘MAMDANI Act’

Trump says he will ‘remember’ any company that doesn’t request tariff ...


© The Hill