Forty years after Batson, racial bias in jury selection persists

The Supreme Court is once again being asked a fundamental question: Will the constitutional promise of equal protection under the law be meaningfully enforced, or quietly set aside?

That question is at the heart of Pitchford v. Cain, a case being decided by the court in the coming months, which exposes how racial discrimination in jury selection continues to shape who receives a fair trial in America.

Terry Pitchford, a Black man, was sentenced to death in Mississippi in 2006 for his role in a robbery that resulted in a shopkeeper’s death. He was not the shooter and had just turned 18 at the time of the offense.

During his trial, prosecutors struck four of the five prospective Black jurors. His attorney objected, arguing that the strikes were racially motivated in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. No court has ever meaningfully reviewed that claim, which Mississippi courts dismissed on procedural grounds. This allowed credible allegations of racial discrimination to go unexamined.

During oral arguments, several Supreme Court justices raised concerns that the trial court had not allowed defense counsel to fully challenge the strikes, effectively insulating the conduct from scrutiny.

This was also not an isolated incident. The Supreme Court previously found that the same prosecutor in Pitchford’s case had engaged in racial discrimination through the use of peremptory challenges during jury selection in other trials. Then, as now, Mississippi state courts failed to hold him accountable.

Batson v. Kentucky, a landmark case prohibiting racial discrimination in jury selection, was decided in 1986. It was meant to end the shameful practice that undermined verdicts, excluded Black citizens from civic participation, and eroded confidence in the justice system.

And yet four decades later, the problem persists and the consequences are profound.

First, defendants’ constitutional right to a fair trial is compromised. Research consistently shows that less racially diverse juries deliberate less, consider fewer perspectives, and are more prone to wrongful convictions. In a capital case, where the outcome is irreversible, that risk is unacceptable.

Discriminatory jury strikes also violate the rights of the excluded jurors themselves. Those denied their right to serve on a jury because of their race are excluded from participating in one of the most fundamental aspects of democracy.

Finally, such practices erode public trust. When communities believe the system is rigged, victims and witnesses disengage, accountability breaks down, and public safety suffers. The consequences of this breakdown are heightened in a capital case, like Pitchford’s, where the stakes are literally life and death.

Prosecutors occupy a unique position in the criminal justice system. Their duty is not to win at any cost, but to seek justice. That responsibility includes safeguarding the constitutional rights of defendants and ensuring that juries are selected without discrimination. When prosecutors cut constitutional corners or rely on racial bias to secure convictions, and when state courts decline to intervene, federal courts must fulfill their obligation to enforce the Constitution.

The fact that the Supreme Court is again confronting the issue of racial bias during jury selection, 40 years after Batson was decided, is a stark reminder that racism continues to plague the criminal justice system.

The question now is whether the court will confront this reality with clarity and resolve. Will it enforce equal protection when it matters most, or allow procedural arguments to excuse discrimination?

The Supreme Court’s decision in Pitchford v. Cain will test whether a majority of the court is willing to confront the persistence of racial discrimination in jury selection, hold prosecutors accountable for their legal and ethical obligations, and ensure our justice system lives up to its constitutional promise of fairness and equality.

Aramis Donell Ayala is a former Florida state attorney and executive director at Fair and Just Prosecution.

Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

More Opinions - Criminal Justice News

Sudden GOP infighting explodes over bipartisan immigration reform bill

Swalwell furor engulfs others accused of wrongdoing, threatening to upend House

UK halts Chagos Island transfer after US withdraws support

Warner on US blockade in Strait of Hormuz: ‘I don’t get that logic’

Lawmakers set to return to Washington as TSA paycheck uncertainty looms over ...

‘This is the last warning:’ Iran radioes US during Strait of Hormuz ...

Trump announces Navy blockade in Strait of Hormuz after Iran talks fizzle

Deadline to file claim in Dollar General class action settlement nears

Kaine says Trump leaving Iran nuclear deal 'one of the worst' foreign policy ...

Trump’s Strait of Hormuz gambit approaches zero hour

Fans express outrage as US World Cup ticket prices soar  

China preparing delivery of new air defense systems to Iran, report says

ICE warehouses get cold shoulder — even in Trump country 

White House ballroom construction can continue, federal appeals court says

Trump administration holds up NOAA grant funding

As AI pushes students to reconsider majors, universities struggle to adapt

This Week on the Hill: 6 big fights Congress faces as it returns

Ex-CIA Director: ‘I think the 25th Amendment was written with’ Trump ‘in ...

The Hill Podcasts – Morning Report

© The Hill