menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Why Scottish nationalists should see Burnham as a real threat – and an opportunity

18 0
yesterday

Fifty years ago this month, a group of leftwing Scots gathered in the Golden Lion hotel in Stirling for the inaugural conference of a new political party. The “Scottish Labour party” had formally split from Labour at the beginning of 1976, driven by disillusionment over the party’s timid proposals for a new Scottish assembly. They were led by the firebrand MP for South Ayrshire, Jim Sillars, who promised to take Scotland’s Labour tradition back to its roots in both socialism and home rule.

Sillars’ new party was a media sensation in Scotland, and quickly joined by public intellectuals such as Tom Nairn, Hamish Henderson and Neal Ascherson. It offered something new and exciting: a fusion of the two movements that were battling for Scotland’s soul in a decade that had already been defined by electoral clashes between Labour and the Scottish National party.

The party struggled, however, to enthuse the working-class voters on whom Sillars had gambled his future. It did attract a handful of Trotskyist activists from the International Marxist Group, and at the October 1976 conference, Sillars orchestrated a heavy-handed purge of the far left, causing proceedings to degenerate into near-violence. At one point, a member of the party’s national organising committee summoned up Ayrshire’s mining heritage against the “entryist” threat, yelling: “We should get our fucking pit boots on and wade into them!”

Andy Burnham was not quite as forthright earlier this month, when, midway through the SNP’s conference in Aberdeen, he delivered his own speech in Motherwell, offering to cooperate on further devolution within Scotland. The conference itself was far more peaceful, the SNP having already shed its “fundamentalist” wing with the breakaway of Alex Salmond’s Alba party (which Sillars, it’s........

© The Guardian