1 Trending: 23 State AGs Probe Federal Judicial Center’s Distribution Of ‘Biased’ Climate Guide To Judges

2 Trending: Data Center Animosity Reflects Legit Concerns AI-Mongers Don’t Care About Humanity’s Interests

3 Trending: Lawmakers Open Investigation Into ‘Thriving Birth Tourism Economy’

4 Trending: The Ultimate Guide To Semiquincentennial Merch For A Red-White-And-Blue 250th

National Sovereignty Is At Stake In Imminent Supreme Court Ruling

SCOTUS should rule that the 14th Amendment does not grant citizenship to children of illegal aliens born within the territory of the U.S.

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

With the Supreme Court nearing the end of this term, it will soon release its ruling in Trump v. Barbara, the landmark case on the constitutionality of President Trump’s Jan. 20, 2025, executive order clarifying and protecting the meaning of American birthright citizenship. Expectation that the court will rule against the president has prompted a recent social media blast from Trump against the unreliable “conservative” justices on the court. Trump predicted that the court will be “ruling against us on Birthright Citizenship, making us the only Country in the World that practices this unsustainable, unsafe, and incredibly costly DISASTER. I don’t want loyalty, but I do want and expect it for our country … Sometimes decisions have to be allowed to use Good, Strong, Common Sense as a guide.”

President Trump is predictably insightful in his analysis of the politics of the court. Despite Chief Justice John Roberts’ desire to preserve the alleged impartiality and supra-political character of the court, it is impossible to deny that the courts have always been political actors in American government. As the president exhorted, the Supreme Court should make its decisions by “Good, Strong Common Sense” and with an underlying loyalty to the United States, which means loyal prioritization of our people, our founding principles, and our national preservation. Fortunately, the original meaning of the 14th Amendment supports President Trump’s position.

Specifically, while U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), which allegedly established the liberal interpretation of birthright citizenship, should ultimately be overturned, there remains a viable path where the court could uphold that........

© The Federalist