1 Trending: Elizabeth Holmes And Lindsay Clancy Defenders Are Cut From The Same Sociopathic Cloth

2 Trending: If You Think Ending Discrimination Against Stay-At-Home Moms Is ‘Welfare,’ You’re Not Conservative

3 Trending: Homelessness Non-Profits Are Killing Los Angeles

4 Trending: The Loss Of Charlie Kirk Is Still Rippling Through MAGA Movement A Year After Assassination

Lindsay Clancy Jurors Are Reminiscent Of The Covid Cult

The majority badgered and bullied the holdout juror who didn’t ‘trust the experts’ on the ‘science’ of postpartum psychosis. Sound familiar?

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

Kellie Farina’s frustration was palpable, her disdain still fresh as she described her unyielding fellow juror. Farina said the man just didn’t get it. Despite all of the evidence (the toxicology report, the “expert” testimony, the “entertaining” defense attorney), he refused to join the 11 jury members who had long before agreed that Lindsay Clancy was not guilty of murdering her three young children. 

The 11 angry men and women on the jury agreed that Clancy was legally insane when she used exercise bands to strangle to death Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months — one by one in the Clancy basement. She then attempted to take her own life. But after 40 hours of deliberations, the holdout wouldn’t budge. 

“We read to him on numerous occasions the definition of reasonable doubt from Judge (William) Sullivan’s instruction,” an exasperated Farina told Boston’s NBC 10 this week in an exclusive interview. “He actually said one day in the end, ‘Why don’t we have the judge come in and read it again?’ And we were like, ‘No, we have it in front of us.’”

WOW. The pro-Clancy juror who was angry that the male holdout “couldn’t get over the fact that Lindsay Clancy viciously killed her children” was the pink dress-wearing juror first reported by MAMA Magazine. https://t.co/PrSNRkQGta pic.twitter.com/T5qknzobXS— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) September 9, 2026

WOW. The pro-Clancy juror who was angry that the male holdout “couldn’t get over the fact that Lindsay Clancy viciously killed her children” was the pink dress-wearing juror first reported by MAMA Magazine. https://t.co/PrSNRkQGta pic.twitter.com/T5qknzobXS

Farina, a senior center chef, flirted with the term “rogue” in describing the unidentified juror. She spoke of how her 10 compatriots would get up during the “hours of frustration” and walk the room “because you couldn’t sit any more.” She said they would inevitably end up at the cart that held the trial exhibits. 

“He was very arrogant. He really did not take anything that anybody said,” juror Paula Devlin said, aggravated that the intransigent man wouldn’t listen to the nurses on the jury, the “experts” in her mind. 

“We had the toxicology report. We........

© The Federalist