Here Are Three ‘America First’ Questions About Trump’s Iran-Israel War
1 Trending: SCOTUS Blocks California School Policy Hiding Kids’ ‘Gender Presentation’ From Parents
2 Trending: Texas Fire Chaplain Fired After Saying Men Don’t Belong In Women’s Sports Scores $78K Settlement
3 Trending: You Don’t Hate Media Enough: NYT, WaPo Remember Ayatollah As ‘Cleric’ With ‘Easy Smile’
4 Trending: Mamdani Says Quiet Part Out Loud About Democrats’ Tax-Hiking Agenda
Here Are Three ‘America First’ Questions About Trump’s Iran-Israel War
There are important questions about Iran, Israel and the U.S. The Trump administration isn’t offering answers for obvious reasons.
Share Article on Facebook
Share Article on Twitter
Share Article on Truth Social
Share Article via Email
Given the mess of inconsistent justifications from the Trump administration regarding our new long-term project in Iran, there’s not much reason to expect anything forthcoming from the president or his cabinet on what exactly is happening over there and why. Depending on who’s talking at any given hour, our involvement in another Middle East war is for the purpose of stopping Iran from building nuclear weapons; taking out the country’s menacing leadership; freeing its oppressed citizenry; preempting an attack that otherwise would have been initiated by Israel; or any combination thereof.
President Trump and other administration officials have made themselves plenty available to the media but are notably defensive when faced with obvious questions as to how this war benefits Americans or otherwise squares would Trump’s well-remembered promise to end international conflicts rather than start them. (Can he still get his Nobel Peace Prize?)
Condescension isn’t a substitute for honesty. This is life and death. To wit, multiple Americans have already died, and the president has helpfully informed us that he anticipates more.
Here are three “America First” questions for the Trump administration’s Iran-Israel war.
Can you explain how it’s in our interest for the Israeli government to dictate U.S. policy in the Middle East as it pertains to using our military and risking the lives of American men and women on behalf of another country’s ambitions? State Secretary Marco Rubio admitted Monday that the administration “knew that there was going to be an Israeli action” against Iran, and so Trump “made the very wise decision” to be the first to attack. In other words, our “closest ally,” Israel, a country that only exists because we fund its defense, forced us into war for its own interests. The New York Times this week reported that Israel is now “seizing the new war as an opportunity to pursue its own geopolitical agenda,” and striking targets in other countries, too.
Rubio: I’ve been asked: why now? One reason why is it was abundantly clear that if Iran came under attack by anyone, the United States or Israel or anyone, they were going to respond and respond against the United States.If we stood and waited for that attack to come first,… pic.twitter.com/M0j26OX8dw— Acyn (@Acyn) March 2, 2026
Rubio: I’ve been asked: why now? One reason why is it was abundantly clear that if Iran came under attack by anyone, the United States or Israel or anyone, they were going to respond and respond against the United States.If we stood and waited for that attack to come first,… pic.twitter.com/M0j26OX8dw
To what extent does Israel continue to be an asset to the U.S. and to what extent are Americans responsible for the welfare of that country? If it’s true that this war serves as an “opportunity” for Israel, and our own decisions in it are dependent on what Israel does, it’s important to know what time table Israel is working on because it will apparently dictate our own. If Israel is expanding its attacks into other countries, it’s a great question as to whether we will be forced to do the same, again.
Charlie Kirk said last year that a new war in the Middle East would “not be easy” and, in fact, would be “a catastrophic mistake.” He credited Trump for his “restraint” in starting one. Was Kirk wrong? The president himself has said the people he had in mind to lead Iran now are dead and also that the Iranian people should take the opportunity to install a new government. It’s a mess that someone is going to have to clean up, and Trump has openly stated the U.S. is now involved indefinitely.
Those are obvious questions and the very unappealing answers are becoming clear, even if the administration isn’t readily offering them.
More from Foreign Policy
How To Stay Sane And Not Look Stupid When Talking About The Iran War
Canada’s Mark Carney Can’t Even Challenge American Hegemony Without American Help
It’s Time For Trump To Win The West’s Civil War
Starmer’s Pathetic China Debut Is A Lesson For All Western Leaders
Dems’ Latest Map Power Grab Continues Gerrymandering On Steroids
How Israel ‘Chain-Ganged’ The Trump Administration Into War Against Iran
How To Stay Sane And Not Look Stupid When Talking About The Iran War
I Wish GOP Senators Got As Excited About The SAVE Act As They Do About War
Visit The Federalist on Facebook
Visit The Federalist on Twitter
Visit The Federalist on Instagram
Watch The Federalist on YouTube
View The Federalist RSS Feed
Listen to The Federalist Podcast
© 2026 The Federalist, A wholly independent division of FDRLST Media. All rights reserved.
Visit The Federalist on Facebook
Visit The Federalist on Twitter
Visit The Federalist on Instagram
Watch The Federalist on YouTube
View The Federalist RSS Feed
Listen to The Federalist Podcast
