1 Trending: The Smithsonian Has No Business Saying America Is Built On ‘Stolen Land’

2 Trending: What To Do When Cancel Culture Invades Your Home

3 Trending: Charlie Kirk’s Biggest Legacy Will Be Inspiring Young People To Get Married

4 Trending: David French Accidentally Admits He Was Never Conservative

Clancy Juror Appears To Admit Jurors Used Outside Expertise To Badger Holdout

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

Several jurors in the Lindsay Clancy trial appear to have openly admitted to violating jury instruction by using their own experience to make their decision on a verdict while deliberating.

In an exclusive interview with NBC 10, a handful of the female jurors who voted to acquit Clancy bemoaned the lone male holdout. The jurors, among them nurses, accused the male holdout of being “very arrogant.” One juror said that the holdout wanted to focus on the toxicology report and that “the nurses in the room spoke to that … they spoke to that specific thing” as if their expertise should have forced him to accept their interpretation of the evidence. The jurors then decried that the lone male holdout “completely disregarded” their supposed expertise, and said the male juror “had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children.”

But disregarding the nurses’ outside opinions is precisely what the judge told the jurors to do.

According to the court transcript, the judge told jurors: “If somebody has a question in that jury room, you are........

© The Federalist