‘The Timing Is Suspicious’: Intel IG Admitted Under Oath He Changed Whistleblower Rules For Anti-Trump Ukraine Op In 2019
1 Trending: Democrats’ Smear Machine Spares No One In Its Quest For Power
2 Trending: Exclusive: How Trump Hopes To Make The Economy Work For Families And Not Vice-Versa
3 Trending: Eric Swalwell Suspends Campaign Amid Sexual Assault Accusations
4 Trending: American Youth Are Returning To Church, But They Need Encouragement To Keep Them There
‘The Timing Is Suspicious’: Intel IG Admitted Under Oath He Changed Whistleblower Rules For Anti-Trump Ukraine Op In 2019
Atkinson’s own 2019 testimony, now public, confirms the ICIG did change the rules and that Davis and The Federalist weren’t ‘conspiracy theorists,’ but rather, the only real journalists around.
Share Article on Facebook
Share Article on Twitter
Share Article on Truth Social
Share Article via Email
Former Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) Michael Atkinson admitted under oath that he personally ordered a secret rewrite of the whistleblower complaint form in August 2019 that was used as the basis for a phony impeachment operation against President Donald Trump, going so far as to admit changing the form looked “suspicious.”
Newly unveiled testimony from October of 2019 shows that Atkinson conceded the change he ordered to the whistleblower complaint form “looks suspicious” but said the timing was merely “unfortunate.”
“So the timing is unfortunate. It looks suspicious, I get that,” Atkinson testified. Atkinson said that after several media inquiries highlighted that the then-current form required first-hand knowledge of wrongdoing in order for a complaint to meet the urgency threshold to be sent to Congress, he ordered his staff to secretly change the rules so that second-hand hearsay complaints could be a legitimate basis for expedited processing.
“What I should have done was I should have explained when we changed the form why we were changing it,” he said. “I should have been more transparent about the reasons and the motivations for the change in the forms.”
The admission vindicates years of reporting by The Federalist that........
